Mazda Tribute MOT Results

Registered in 2004
51.6% pass rate
from 289 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the Mazda Tribute is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Suspension (32% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 14% fail on Prescribed areas (8 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 12% fail on Component mounting (9 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Spring mounting (38 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Subframe mounting (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 7.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 6.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.35% fail on Linkage condition
    • 5.2% fail on Drive shafts
      • 5.2% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 5.2% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 4.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.35% fail on Attachment
    • 2.4% fail on Coil springs
      • 1.7% fail on Condition
      • 0.69% fail on Location (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.69% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.69% fail on Front
    • 0.35% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.35% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.35% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.35% fail on Condition
  • 23% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 10% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 9.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 9.0% fail on Front lamps (67% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.2% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.35% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.35% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 1.4% fail on Stop lamp (74% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.0% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.35% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.4% fail on Hazard warning (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Switch (9 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim (81% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Battery
    • 0.69% fail on Horn
    • 0.35% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.35% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.35% fail on Tell tale
  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 11% fail on Hydraulic systems (110% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 11% fail on Components (120% worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 9.3% fail on Hoses (7 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Pipes
      • 0.35% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 2.8% fail on Hub components
      • 2.1% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.4% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.4% fail on ABS
    • 0.69% fail on Air and vacuum systems (17 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Components (27 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.35% fail on Pipes
        • 0.35% fail on Servos
    • 0.69% fail on Brake performance (91% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.35% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.35% fail on Parking brake performance
  • 9.7% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.2% fail on Wipers
    • 1.4% fail on Bonnet (6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Washers
    • 1.4% fail on Mirrors (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.69% fail on Windscreen
  • 7.3% fail on Steering
    • 6.6% fail on Steering system
      • 3.5% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.7% fail on Steering arm (12 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.69% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.0% fail on Power steering
      • 0.69% fail on Pipes and hoses (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Other components
    • 0.69% fail on Locking devices (18 times worse than other 2004 cars)
  • 6.6% fail on Tyres
    • 4.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.69% fail on Valve stem (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
  • 6.6% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 5.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.4% fail on Emissions
    • 0.35% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.35% fail on Pipe
    • 0.35% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 5.9% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Body condition (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Vehicle structure (6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Chassis (6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
  • 4.2% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.5% fail on Seat belts (140% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Condition
      • 0.35% fail on Requirements
    • 0.69% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.69% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 1.7% fail on Towbars (61 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Vehicle structure (93 times worse than other 2004 cars)
  • 0.35% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.35% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages