Mazda Tribute MOT Results

Registered in 2002
43.3% pass rate
from 178 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Mazda Tribute is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Suspension (61% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 14% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 8.4% fail on Springs (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (62 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Coil springs
        • 2.8% fail on Coil spring
        • 1.1% fail on Mounting (29 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.4% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 2.2% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.56% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 5.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.2% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.56% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.2% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.1% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.1% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.56% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.56% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.56% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 26% fail on Body, chassis, structure (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 10% fail on Chassis (14 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 10% fail on Chassis condition (14 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 7.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 4.5% fail on Transmission
      • 3.4% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.4% fail on Joints
      • 1.1% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.56% fail on Prop shaft
        • 0.56% fail on Joints
    • 3.4% fail on Doors (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Driver's door (19 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Door condition (22 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Front passenger's door (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Door condition (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Towbar (28 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Vehicle structure (34 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.56% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.56% fail on Tank
    • 0.56% fail on Floor
  • 24% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.4% fail on Position lamps (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 8.4% fail on Position lamp (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 7.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 7.9% fail on Headlamp
    • 5.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.7% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.1% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.1% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.56% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.56% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.56% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 11% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 11% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 11% fail on Spark ignition
        • 6.2% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 4.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 11% fail on Brakes
    • 3.4% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 3.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 2.8% fail on Brake performance (66% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 1.1% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.56% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.56% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.56% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.56% fail on Rbt
          • 0.56% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 2.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.2% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.1% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.56% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.56% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.56% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.56% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 7.3% fail on Tyres
    • 6.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.56% fail on Size/type
    • 0.56% fail on Condition
  • 6.2% fail on Steering
    • 5.6% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 4.5% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.56% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.56% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.56% fail on Steering play
      • 0.56% fail on Steering rack
  • 5.6% fail on Visibility
    • 4.5% fail on Wipers
    • 1.7% fail on Washers
    • 0.56% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.5% fail on Prescribed areas (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.56% fail on Airbags
      • 0.56% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 1.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.56% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.56% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages