Mazda RX-8 MOT Results
Registered in 200979.2% pass rate
from 346 tests in 2021
(46% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Mazda RX-8 is unusually good or bad.
-
6.6% fail on
Brakes
-
5.2% fail on
Brake performance
-
3.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 3.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
2.0% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.0% fail on
Rbt
- 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.58% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
2.0% fail on
Rbt
-
0.58% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.58% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.58% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.58% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.58% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.58% fail on
Rbt
- 0.58% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.58% fail on
Rbt
- 0.29% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
3.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
1.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.87% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.87% fail on Brake pads
-
0.29% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.29% fail on Brake discs
-
0.87% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.87% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.58% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.29% fail on Electronic stability control
-
5.2% fail on
Brake performance
-
6.1% fail on
Suspension
(59% better than other 2009 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.4% fail on Linkage (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.58% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.29% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.29% fail on Ball joint
- 0.29% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
2.3% fail on
Springs
(60% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Coil springs
(60% better than other 2009 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Coil spring (59% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Coil springs
(60% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.87% fail on
Suspension arms
(81% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.29% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.29% fail on Shock absorbers
-
3.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
5.8% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
5.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.5% fail on
Spark ignition
(100% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 2.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.58% fail on
Emission control equipment
(30 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Catalytic converter (53 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Emissions not tested
-
5.5% fail on
Spark ignition
(100% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.29% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
5.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.6% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(63% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.29% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.87% fail on
Headlamps
(73% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Headlamp (81% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.58% fail on Stop lamp (83% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.29% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.29% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.29% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.29% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.29% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.29% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.29% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.29% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.29% fail on Battery(ies)
-
2.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
2.9% fail on
Visibility
- 2.0% fail on Wipers
-
0.29% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.29% fail on Windscreen
-
0.29% fail on
View to rear
- 0.29% fail on Mirrors
- 0.29% fail on Washers
-
2.6% fail on
Tyres
(58% better than other 2009 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Condition
- 0.87% fail on Tread depth (75% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.2% fail on Registration plates
-
0.87% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(82% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.29% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.29% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
0.29% fail on
Seats
- 0.29% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.87% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.58% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.29% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.29% fail on Condition