Mazda Premacy MOT Results
Registered in 200350.7% pass rate
from 75 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Mazda Premacy is unusually good or bad.
-
23% fail on
Suspension
-
13% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(180% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 9.3% fail on Linkage ball joints (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.3% fail on Ball joint
- 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 12% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.3% fail on Ball joint
-
13% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(180% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
21% fail on
Brakes
-
17% fail on
Brake performance
(130% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
9.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 9.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
8.0% fail on
Service brake performance
-
8.0% fail on
Rbt
- 5.3% fail on Service brake performance
- 4.0% fail on Service brake imbalance (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
8.0% fail on
Rbt
-
2.7% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
2.7% fail on
Rbt
- 2.7% fail on Parking brake performance
-
2.7% fail on
Rbt
-
1.3% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
9.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
4.0% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.7% fail on Brake pads
-
1.3% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.3% fail on Brake discs
-
2.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
4.0% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 4.0% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 4.0% fail on Electronic stability control (11 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
17% fail on
Brake performance
(130% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
15% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
4.0% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.0% fail on Headlamp
- 4.0% fail on Stop lamp
- 4.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
2.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
-
1.3% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.3% fail on Battery(ies)
-
4.0% fail on
Headlamps
-
11% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
4.0% fail on
Chassis
(6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Chassis condition (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 2.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
2.7% fail on
Body
(8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Panel
- 1.3% fail on Other body component
-
1.3% fail on
Transmission
-
1.3% fail on
Drive shafts
- 1.3% fail on Joints
-
1.3% fail on
Drive shafts
- 1.3% fail on Floor
-
4.0% fail on
Chassis
(6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
11% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Seat belts
- 5.3% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Condition
- 5.3% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Airbags
- 1.3% fail on Drivers airbag
-
5.3% fail on
Seat belts
-
9.3% fail on
Visibility
- 5.3% fail on Washers
- 4.0% fail on Wipers
-
8.0% fail on
Tyres
- 4.0% fail on Condition
- 4.0% fail on Tread depth
-
4.0% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Registration plates (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Steering
-
2.7% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.3% fail on Ball joint
- 1.3% fail on Track rod end
-
2.7% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
2.7% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
2.7% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.7% fail on
Spark ignition
- 2.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
2.7% fail on
Spark ignition
-
2.7% fail on
Exhaust emissions