Mazda Premacy MOT Results

Registered in 2002
43.9% pass rate
from 431 tests in 2017
(13% worse than other 2002 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Mazda Premacy is unusually good or bad.

  • 31% fail on Suspension (41% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 19% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 16% fail on Component mounting (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Subframe mounting (190% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Spring mounting (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 14% fail on Anti-roll bars (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 10% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.46% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.23% fail on Condition
    • 3.0% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.93% fail on Tie bars/rods (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.23% fail on Condition
    • 0.93% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.93% fail on Front
    • 0.70% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.23% fail on Condition
      • 0.23% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.23% fail on Attachment
    • 0.70% fail on Drive shafts (84% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Front drive shafts (84% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.70% fail on Constant velocity joints (83% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.23% fail on Condition
    • 0.23% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.23% fail on Condition
    • 0.23% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.23% fail on Condition
  • 25% fail on Brakes (49% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 16% fail on Brake performance (79% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 7.9% fail on Front wheels (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 6.7% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 4.6% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.6% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.70% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.46% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 7.4% fail on Hub components (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Brake pads (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.2% fail on Brake calipers (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on ABS (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 2.3% fail on Components (61% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Pipes (57% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.70% fail on Hoses
        • 0.23% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.70% fail on Leaks
      • 0.46% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Restricted movement (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.70% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.70% fail on Condition
    • 0.23% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.23% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.23% fail on Warning
    • 0.23% fail on Locking devices
  • 25% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 12% fail on Registration plate lamp (63% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 7.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 7.2% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.46% fail on Rear lamps
    • 5.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.8% fail on Stop lamp (56% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Battery
    • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.93% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.23% fail on Tell tale
  • 13% fail on Tyres
    • 7.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 7.0% fail on Condition (80% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Valve stem
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.9% fail on Wipers
    • 3.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.46% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.23% fail on Mirrors
  • 11% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 9.3% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 8.8% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Condition
      • 0.23% fail on Attachment
    • 2.3% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 2.3% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 7.9% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Body condition (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Vehicle structure (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Chassis (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Doors
      • 0.23% fail on Drivers
  • 3.2% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (59% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Exhaust system (64% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.93% fail on Emissions (73% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.23% fail on Cap
      • 0.23% fail on System
    • 0.46% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 2.3% fail on Steering (53% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Steering system
      • 1.9% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.23% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.23% fail on Power steering
      • 0.23% fail on Operation
      • 0.23% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 1.6% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.23% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.23% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages