Mazda MX-5 MOT Results

Registered in 1996
59.0% pass rate
from 1,887 tests in 2017
(7.2% better than other 1996 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 cars and highlighted areas where the Mazda MX-5 is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 13% fail on Brake performance (52% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Parking brake performance (73% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Rear wheels (78% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Front wheels (43% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Service brake performance (60% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.32% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.053% fail on Brake operation
    • 3.4% fail on Hydraulic systems (44% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Components (46% better than other 1996 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Pipes (33% better than other 1996 cars)
        • 0.53% fail on Hoses (72% better than other 1996 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.26% fail on Leaks
      • 0.21% fail on Operation
      • 0.16% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 2.7% fail on Hub components
      • 1.8% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.69% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.32% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.053% fail on Brake back plates
    • 0.95% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.90% fail on Condition
      • 0.053% fail on Fitment
    • 0.37% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.21% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.21% fail on Pedal
        • 0.16% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.053% fail on Condition
    • 0.053% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.053% fail on Cable
    • 0.053% fail on ABS
  • 15% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (27% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (40% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Fog lamp (40% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.16% fail on Switch
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.11% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 1.9% fail on Horn (120% worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Position lamps (62% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Front lamps (55% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Rear lamps (78% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plate lamp (65% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Battery
    • 1.2% fail on Stop lamp (73% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 0.95% fail on Direction indicators (65% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Flashing type (65% better than other 1996 cars)
        • 0.58% fail on Individual lamps (63% better than other 1996 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Side repeaters (66% better than other 1996 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.053% fail on Tell tales
    • 0.21% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.16% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 15% fail on Suspension (23% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Coil springs (4 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Location
    • 4.1% fail on Prescribed areas (39% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Component mounting (49% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.16% fail on Spring mounting (73% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.2% fail on Condition
    • 1.9% fail on Suspension arms (39% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (36% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Condition
      • 0.053% fail on Attachment
    • 1.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (55% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (57% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.21% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.053% fail on Condition
    • 0.58% fail on Front suspension joints (53% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment
    • 0.16% fail on Wheel bearings (91% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Front (82% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices (4 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 0.053% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.053% fail on Attachment
    • 0.053% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.053% fail on Attachment
    • 0.053% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.053% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.053% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.053% fail on Condition
  • 11% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (93% worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 11% fail on Seat belts (120% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 10% fail on Prescribed areas (140% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Condition
      • 0.053% fail on Attachment
    • 0.16% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (79% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (85% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 9.9% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 7.5% fail on Emissions
    • 3.4% fail on Exhaust system (30% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.21% fail on Fuel system (81% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Cap
  • 6.6% fail on Driver's view of the road (24% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Wipers (35% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.53% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.21% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.4% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.5% fail on Body condition
    • 1.9% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.9% fail on Chassis
    • 0.11% fail on Doors (84% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Drivers
      • 0.053% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.11% fail on Seats
      • 0.053% fail on Passengers
      • 0.053% fail on Drivers
  • 4.2% fail on Tyres (30% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Tread depth (34% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.16% fail on Size/type
    • 0.11% fail on Valve stem
  • 1.7% fail on Steering (64% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 0.90% fail on Steering system (77% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Track rod end (62% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Steering rack (88% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.37% fail on Power steering
      • 0.16% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.16% fail on Other components
      • 0.053% fail on Operation
      • 0.053% fail on Drive system
    • 0.32% fail on Locking devices (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Steering control
      • 0.16% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.053% fail on Steering operation
  • 1.1% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.26% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.26% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages