Mazda MX-5 MOT Results
Registered in 199567.1% pass rate
from 765 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Mazda MX-5 is unusually good or bad.
-
12% fail on
Brakes
-
9.3% fail on
Brake performance
-
5.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(100% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (120% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
3.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
3.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
3.1% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.0% fail on
Rbt
- 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.39% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.13% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
-
3.0% fail on
Rbt
-
2.4% fail on
Parking brake performance
(160% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Rbt
(150% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Parking brake performance (190% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.13% fail on Parking brake performance
-
2.2% fail on
Rbt
(150% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
5.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(100% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.4% fail on
Parking brake control
(2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
0.92% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.78% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.78% fail on Brake pads
-
0.26% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.26% fail on Brake discs
-
0.78% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.52% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.39% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.39% fail on Hand lever
-
0.26% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.26% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.13% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.13% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.13% fail on Other braking system component
-
0.13% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
0.13% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.13% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
9.3% fail on
Brake performance
-
11% fail on
Suspension
-
4.7% fail on
Springs
(2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Coil springs
(3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Coil spring (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Coil springs
(3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 1.7% fail on Shock absorbers (160% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.78% fail on Ball joint
- 0.65% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.13% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes
-
1.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.78% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.39% fail on Linkage
- 0.13% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.13% fail on Ball joint
- 0.13% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.39% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.39% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
0.26% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.26% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
4.7% fail on
Springs
(2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
11% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
3.8% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.39% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
2.1% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.1% fail on Headlamp
-
2.1% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.2% fail on Horn
- 1.0% fail on Battery(ies)
-
1.7% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 0.92% fail on Stop lamp (71% better than other 1995 cars)
-
0.92% fail on
Direction indicators
(68% better than other 1995 cars)
-
0.92% fail on
Flashing type
(68% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.26% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.92% fail on
Flashing type
(68% better than other 1995 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.13% fail on Position lamp
-
3.8% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
9.4% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
9.0% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
9.0% fail on
Spark ignition
(45% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 7.3% fail on Catalyst emissions (50% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.65% fail on
Emission control equipment
(3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Catalytic converter (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.26% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.13% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.13% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.13% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
0.13% fail on
Emission control equipment
-
9.0% fail on
Spark ignition
(45% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
0.65% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.26% fail on Other leaks
- 0.13% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.13% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 0.13% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
-
9.0% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
6.3% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(36% better than other 1995 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 2.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
2.0% fail on
Chassis
- 2.0% fail on Chassis condition
- 1.8% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.26% fail on
Body
- 0.13% fail on Panel
- 0.13% fail on Other body component
-
0.13% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.13% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.13% fail on
Towbar
- 0.13% fail on Other towbar components
-
0.13% fail on
Doors
-
0.13% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.13% fail on Door condition
-
0.13% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.13% fail on Floor
-
0.13% fail on
Seats
- 0.13% fail on Driver's seat
-
2.4% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
-
5.9% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(72% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
5.6% fail on
Seat belts
(96% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 5.4% fail on Prescribed areas (140% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Attachment
- 0.13% fail on Condition
- 0.39% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.13% fail on
Airbags
- 0.13% fail on Drivers airbag
- 0.13% fail on Passengers airbag
-
5.6% fail on
Seat belts
(96% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
4.8% fail on
Visibility
- 2.7% fail on Washers
- 2.4% fail on Wipers
- 0.13% fail on Bonnet
-
0.13% fail on
View to rear
- 0.13% fail on Mirrors
-
1.7% fail on
Tyres
- 0.92% fail on Tread depth
- 0.78% fail on Condition
-
1.4% fail on
Steering
(66% better than other 1995 cars)
-
0.78% fail on
Steering linkage components
(71% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Track rod end
-
0.52% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.52% fail on Steering rack
- 0.26% fail on Steering wheel
-
0.78% fail on
Steering linkage components
(71% better than other 1995 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.3% fail on Registration plates
-
0.13% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.13% fail on Attachment