MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mazda » MPV » 2010

Mazda MPV MOT Results

Registered in 2010
47.9% pass rate
from 73 tests in 2021
(51% worse than other 2010 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Mazda MPV is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 12% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (20 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 12% fail on Rear fog lamp (20 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 12% fail on Rear fog lamp (20 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 11% fail on Headlamps (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 11% fail on Headlamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.4% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.4% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 22% fail on Suspension
    • 12% fail on Anti-roll bars (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Pins and bushes (87 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (34 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 9.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (98 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.7% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 18% fail on Body, chassis, structure (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure (131 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 6.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (183 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Exhaust system (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Chassis
      • 1.4% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.4% fail on Bumpers
    • 1.4% fail on Transmission
      • 1.4% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.4% fail on Joints
    • 1.4% fail on Cabs
      • 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 16% fail on Brakes (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 8.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.8% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 5.5% fail on Rbt
          • 5.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.4% fail on Decelerometer
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
    • 4.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 4.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 4.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.4% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.4% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.7% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 2.7% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 1.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 9.6% fail on Visibility
    • 6.8% fail on Washers
    • 4.1% fail on Wipers
  • 9.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 8.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 8.2% fail on Spark ignition (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 5.5% fail on Catalyst emissions (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.7% fail on Emissions not tested (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.4% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 5.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Seat belts (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Prescribed areas (76 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 5.5% fail on Tyres
    • 2.7% fail on Condition
    • 2.7% fail on Tread depth
  • 2.7% fail on Steering
    • 1.4% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.4% fail on Track rod end
    • 1.4% fail on Steering play
      • 1.4% fail on Steering rack

Search Good Garages