Mazda MPV MOT Results
Registered in 200548.6% pass rate
from 72 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Mazda MPV is unusually good or bad.
-
25% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
8.3% fail on
Headlamps
- 8.3% fail on Headlamp
-
8.3% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
8.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 8.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
8.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
5.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
- 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.8% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.8% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 1.4% fail on Side repeaters
-
2.8% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.4% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.4% fail on Battery(ies)
-
8.3% fail on
Headlamps
-
25% fail on
Suspension
- 15% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
13% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(130% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Pins and bushes (20 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 2.8% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 2.8% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
-
2.8% fail on
Sub-frames
- 2.8% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (16 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
22% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(160% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Sub-frame
- 1.4% fail on Sub-frame condition
-
4.2% fail on
Chassis
(10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Chassis condition (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.8% fail on
Fuel system
(4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Hose
- 1.4% fail on System
-
2.8% fail on
Transmission
-
2.8% fail on
Drive shafts
- 2.8% fail on Joints
-
2.8% fail on
Drive shafts
-
2.8% fail on
Seats
(13 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Passenger's seat (28 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Bumpers
-
1.4% fail on
Doors
-
1.4% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 1.4% fail on Door condition
-
1.4% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
1.4% fail on
Cabs
- 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas
-
4.2% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
14% fail on
Brakes
-
8.3% fail on
Brake performance
-
4.2% fail on
Service brake performance
-
4.2% fail on
Rbt
- 4.2% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.4% fail on
Decelerometer
- 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
-
4.2% fail on
Rbt
-
2.8% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 1.4% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 1.4% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
1.4% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
- 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
-
1.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 1.4% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
4.2% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.8% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.8% fail on Brake pads
-
2.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.4% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 1.4% fail on Master cylinder
- 1.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
8.3% fail on
Brake performance
-
9.7% fail on
Visibility
- 5.6% fail on Wipers
- 2.8% fail on Washers
- 1.4% fail on Bonnet
-
1.4% fail on
Condition of glass
- 1.4% fail on Windscreen
-
5.6% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
5.6% fail on
Seat belts
(3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Condition
-
5.6% fail on
Seat belts
(3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
5.6% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
2.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.8% fail on
Compression ignition
- 1.4% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested
-
2.8% fail on
Compression ignition
-
2.8% fail on
Fluid leaks
(5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 1.4% fail on Other leaks
-
2.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.6% fail on
Tyres
- 2.8% fail on Condition
- 2.8% fail on Tread depth
-
4.2% fail on
Steering
- 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas
-
1.4% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.4% fail on Track rod end
-
1.4% fail on
Power steering
- 1.4% fail on Other components
-
1.4% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.4% fail on Registration plates