MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mazda » MPV » 2004

Mazda MPV MOT Results

Registered in 2004
47.5% pass rate
from 120 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the Mazda MPV is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Suspension
    • 13% fail on Anti-roll bars (130% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 9.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 2.5% fail on Linkage condition (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.83% fail on Attachment
    • 13% fail on Prescribed areas (8 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 12% fail on Component mounting (9 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Subframe mounting (7 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 13% fail on Suspension arms (180% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (200% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.7% fail on Sub-frames (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.83% fail on Condition
      • 0.83% fail on Attachment
    • 1.7% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.83% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.83% fail on Front
  • 28% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 16% fail on Registration plate lamp (140% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 10% fail on Position lamps
      • 9.2% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.83% fail on Rear lamps
    • 5.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.7% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.83% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.83% fail on Battery
    • 0.83% fail on Horn
    • 0.83% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 20% fail on Brakes
    • 13% fail on Brake performance
      • 9.2% fail on Rear wheels (150% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 6.7% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 3.3% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.83% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.83% fail on Service brake performance
    • 4.2% fail on Electronic stability system (18 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.7% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (13 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.83% fail on Components
        • 0.83% fail on Hoses
    • 2.5% fail on Hub components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.83% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.7% fail on ABS
    • 0.83% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.83% fail on Condition
    • 0.83% fail on Restricted movement
  • 12% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 9.2% fail on Seat belts (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 8.3% fail on Prescribed areas (8 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.83% fail on Condition
    • 3.3% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 3.3% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 11% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Body condition (6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Doors (9 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Passengers other (19 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Vehicle structure (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Chassis (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
  • 10% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.5% fail on Wipers
    • 1.7% fail on Washers
    • 0.83% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.83% fail on Mirrors
  • 8.3% fail on Tyres
    • 5.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 4.2% fail on Condition
  • 4.2% fail on Steering
    • 4.2% fail on Steering system
      • 4.2% fail on Track rod end
  • 4.2% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 1.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.7% fail on Emissions
    • 0.83% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 1.7% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.7% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages