Mazda MPV MOT Results

Registered in 2003
53.2% pass rate
from 126 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Mazda MPV is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 13% fail on Registration plate lamp (91% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.3% fail on Front lamps
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.0% fail on Headlamp
    • 4.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 2.4% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.79% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.79% fail on Switch
    • 1.6% fail on Battery
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim (79% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Horn
    • 0.79% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.79% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.79% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.79% fail on Side repeaters
  • 24% fail on Suspension
    • 11% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 10% fail on Component mounting (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 7.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 6.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.6% fail on Condition (21 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 6.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 6.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 3.2% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 3.2% fail on Drive shafts
      • 3.2% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 3.2% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 0.79% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.79% fail on Condition
  • 13% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Body condition (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Doors (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Passengers other (10 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Drivers
    • 3.2% fail on Vehicle structure (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Chassis (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.79% fail on Spare wheel
  • 7.1% fail on Brakes (56% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Hub components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.79% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.79% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.79% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.79% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 0.79% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.79% fail on Leaks
    • 0.79% fail on ABS
    • 0.79% fail on Restricted movement
  • 5.6% fail on Tyres
    • 3.2% fail on Condition
    • 3.2% fail on Tread depth
  • 4.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 4.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.79% fail on Requirements
      • 0.79% fail on Condition
    • 1.6% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.6% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 4.8% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.2% fail on Wipers
    • 0.79% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.79% fail on Washers
  • 3.2% fail on Steering
    • 2.4% fail on Steering system
      • 2.4% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.79% fail on Power steering
      • 0.79% fail on Other components
  • 3.2% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 2.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.6% fail on Emissions
  • 2.4% fail on Road Wheels (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
  • 0.79% fail on Towbars
    • 0.79% fail on Vehicle structure

Search Good Garages