Mazda Demio MOT Results

Registered in 2002

51.6% pass rate

from 517 tests in 2020

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Mazda Demio is unusually good or bad.

26% fail on Suspension (41% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 17% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 7.5% fail on Suspension arms
  - 5.0% fail on Ball joint (86% worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 2.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.19% fail on Pins and bushes
- 2.3% fail on Wheel bearings
- 2.1% fail on Shock absorbers
- 1.4% fail on Sub-frames
  - 0.77% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  - 0.39% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.19% fail on Ball joint
- 1.2% fail on Springs (66% better than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.97% fail on Coil springs (71% better than other 2002 cars)
    - 0.97% fail on Coil spring (70% better than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.19% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
- 0.58% fail on Other suspension component
  - 0.19% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  - 0.19% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.19% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.19% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 0.19% fail on Pins and bushes
17% fail on Body, chassis, structure (58% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 13% fail on Transmission (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 12% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    - 12% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    - 0.39% fail on Flexible couplings (21 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.58% fail on Prop shafts
    - 0.58% fail on Joints
- 2.3% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 2.3% fail on Chassis condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 1.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.19% fail on Sub-frame
    - 0.19% fail on Sub-frame condition
- 0.58% fail on Exhaust system (85% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Fuel system
  - 0.19% fail on Pipe
  - 0.19% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.39% fail on Body
  - 0.39% fail on Panel
- 0.19% fail on Bumpers
- 0.19% fail on Floor
14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (35% better than other 2002 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Headlamps
  - 4.3% fail on Headlamp
- 3.7% fail on Position lamps
  - 3.7% fail on Position lamp
- 2.9% fail on Stop lamp (51% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim (64% better than other 2002 cars)
  - 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim (65% better than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.19% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 1.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 0.77% fail on Direction indicators
  - 0.77% fail on Flashing type
    - 0.77% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.77% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 0.77% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 0.77% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 0.19% fail on Switch
- 0.77% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.58% fail on Battery(ies)
  - 0.19% fail on Horn
9.9% fail on Visibility
- 8.1% fail on Wipers (78% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Washers
- 0.39% fail on Driver's view
- 0.39% fail on Condition of glass
  - 0.39% fail on Windscreen
- 0.19% fail on View to rear
  - 0.19% fail on Mirrors
9.3% fail on Tyres
- 6.4% fail on Tread depth
- 3.3% fail on Condition
- 0.39% fail on Size/type
8.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 4.6% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Seat belts
  - 3.5% fail on Prescribed areas (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.19% fail on Condition
- 0.19% fail on Airbags
  - 0.19% fail on Drivers airbag
7.4% fail on Brakes (52% better than other 2002 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Brake performance (58% better than other 2002 cars)
  - 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
    - 2.3% fail on Rbt
      - 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.77% fail on Service brake imbalance
    - 0.19% fail on Plate brake tester
      - 0.19% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
  - 0.97% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (77% better than other 2002 cars)
    - 0.97% fail on Rbt (sp) (76% better than other 2002 cars)
  - 0.77% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 0.77% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 0.58% fail on Service brake imbalance
      - 0.19% fail on Service brake performance
  - 0.39% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 0.39% fail on Rbt
      - 0.39% fail on Parking brake performance
- 2.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 2.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 2.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 2.1% fail on Brake pads
- 0.58% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.58% fail on Hand lever
- 0.39% fail on Hydraulic systems
  - 0.19% fail on Reservoirs
  - 0.19% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.39% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
  - 0.39% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.19% fail on Parking brake control
  - 0.19% fail on Lever
4.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (45% better than other 2002 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Exhaust emissions (41% better than other 2002 cars)
  - 4.4% fail on Spark ignition
    - 3.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    - 0.58% fail on Catalyst emissions (82% better than other 2002 cars)
    - 0.39% fail on Emissions not tested
    - 0.19% fail on Emission control equipment
      - 0.19% fail on NOx sensor
  - 0.19% fail on Compression ignition
    - 0.19% fail on Emission control equipment
      - 0.19% fail on NOx sensor
3.1% fail on Steering
- 2.9% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 2.9% fail on Track rod end
- 0.19% fail on Steering gear
  - 0.19% fail on Steering rack
0.58% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 0.58% fail on Registration plates