MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mazda » Demio » 2002

Mazda Demio MOT Results

Registered in 2002
47.9% pass rate
from 751 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Mazda Demio is unusually good or bad.

  • 31% fail on Suspension (44% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 17% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 15% fail on Component mounting (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Subframe mounting (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Spring mounting
    • 9.6% fail on Drive shafts (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 9.3% fail on Front drive shafts (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 9.2% fail on Constant velocity joints (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.40% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.40% fail on Drive shafts (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.13% fail on Condition
    • 2.5% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.6% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.5% fail on Front
      • 0.13% fail on Rear
    • 0.93% fail on Coil springs (77% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.93% fail on Condition (77% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.93% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.93% fail on Condition
    • 0.40% fail on Anti-roll bars (93% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.13% fail on Condition
    • 0.40% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.27% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.13% fail on Condition
    • 0.27% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.13% fail on Condition
      • 0.13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.13% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.13% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.13% fail on Condition
  • 17% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (37% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.7% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.40% fail on Rear lamps (80% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Registration plate lamp (44% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.0% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim (51% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Stop lamp (62% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Battery
    • 0.93% fail on Direction indicators (65% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.93% fail on Flashing type (65% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.80% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.27% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.80% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.53% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.27% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.13% fail on Switch
    • 0.53% fail on Horn
    • 0.13% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.13% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.13% fail on Switch
  • 13% fail on Brakes (21% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 7.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.2% fail on Front wheels
      • 3.2% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance (73% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.40% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.27% fail on Service brake performance
    • 3.9% fail on Hydraulic systems (39% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Components
        • 3.1% fail on Pipes
        • 1.1% fail on Hoses
    • 3.1% fail on Hub components
      • 2.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.53% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.13% fail on Brake calipers
    • 1.1% fail on Restricted movement (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.40% fail on Condition
    • 0.27% fail on ABS
  • 11% fail on Tyres
    • 6.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.40% fail on Size/type
    • 0.13% fail on Valve stem
  • 10% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (190% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Drivers airbag (9 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Passengers airbag (37 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Seat belts (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Prescribed areas (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Condition
      • 0.13% fail on Requirements
  • 9.3% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.7% fail on Wipers (42% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Washers (60% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.27% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.13% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.4% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Body condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Body security
    • 0.13% fail on Seats
      • 0.13% fail on Drivers
  • 3.6% fail on Steering
    • 3.1% fail on Steering system
      • 2.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.27% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.13% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.27% fail on Power steering
      • 0.27% fail on Operation
      • 0.13% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.27% fail on Locking devices (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  • 1.3% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (83% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Emissions (69% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Exhaust system (91% better than other 2002 cars)
  • 0.67% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.67% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages