Mazda Demio MOT Results

Registered in 2000
50.3% pass rate
from 875 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Mazda Demio is unusually good or bad.

  • 31% fail on Suspension (43% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 14% fail on Prescribed areas (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 11% fail on Component mounting (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Subframe mounting (99% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Spring mounting
    • 11% fail on Drive shafts (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 11% fail on Front drive shafts (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 11% fail on Constant velocity joints (160% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Suspension arms (45% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 6.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (51% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 2.9% fail on Shock absorbers (75% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Condition (75% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Front suspension joints (73% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.6% fail on Front (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Rear
    • 1.4% fail on Coil springs (56% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Condition (58% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Location
    • 0.46% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.23% fail on Condition
      • 0.23% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.23% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
      • 0.11% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.23% fail on Axles
      • 0.23% fail on Axle beam (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on General condition
    • 0.11% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 0.11% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment
    • 0.11% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 0.11% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 20% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (19% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.7% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.80% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.11% fail on All position lamps
    • 5.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.3% fail on Headlamp
    • 4.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim (42% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp (41% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.0% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.46% fail on Battery
    • 0.46% fail on Direction indicators (83% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Flashing type (83% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.46% fail on Individual lamps (73% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Switch
    • 0.34% fail on Horn
    • 0.34% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.11% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.11% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.11% fail on Switch
  • 13% fail on Brakes (24% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 5.9% fail on Components
        • 5.4% fail on Pipes
        • 0.91% fail on Hoses
      • 0.57% fail on Leaks
      • 0.11% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 5.6% fail on Brake performance (39% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.4% fail on Rear wheels (42% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance (65% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.46% fail on Service brake performance
    • 2.1% fail on Hub components
      • 1.8% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.23% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.57% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.57% fail on Condition
    • 0.34% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.23% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.11% fail on Linkage
      • 0.11% fail on Cable
    • 0.11% fail on Additional braking devices
    • 0.11% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.11% fail on Pedal
        • 0.11% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.11% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.11% fail on Leaks
    • 0.11% fail on ABS
  • 9.6% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.3% fail on Wipers
    • 1.6% fail on Washers (56% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.57% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.34% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.34% fail on Mirrors
  • 8.8% fail on Tyres
    • 5.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.23% fail on Size/type
  • 5.6% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (49% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Emissions (41% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.80% fail on Cap (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Pipe
      • 0.23% fail on System
    • 0.80% fail on Exhaust system (85% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Emissions not tested (80% better than other 2000 cars)
  • 5.4% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 3.3% fail on Body condition (90% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Vehicle structure (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Chassis (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.11% fail on Seats
      • 0.11% fail on Passengers
  • 4.3% fail on Steering
    • 4.1% fail on Steering system
      • 3.5% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.57% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.11% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.11% fail on Power steering
      • 0.11% fail on Pump
    • 0.11% fail on Locking devices
  • 2.9% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (43% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.8% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.46% fail on Condition
    • 0.69% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.69% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 1.0% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.23% fail on Towbars
    • 0.23% fail on Vehicle structure

Search Good Garages