Mazda CX-7 MOT Results
Registered in 200859.9% pass rate
from 312 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Mazda CX-7 is unusually good or bad.
-
13% fail on
Brakes
-
9.6% fail on
Brake performance
(82% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
6.7% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(160% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 4.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 2.2% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (20 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.6% fail on
Rbt
- 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.32% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.32% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.6% fail on
Rbt
-
1.9% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt
- 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.32% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.32% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt
-
0.64% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.64% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.32% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.32% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.64% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.32% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
6.7% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(160% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.6% fail on Brake pads
-
0.64% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.64% fail on Brake discs
-
1.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.9% fail on
Parking brake control
(3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Lever (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.96% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.64% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.32% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.32% fail on Hand lever
- 0.32% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
9.6% fail on
Brake performance
(82% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
13% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
6.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
(91% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 6.1% fail on Headlamp aim (92% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.64% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
4.8% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.2% fail on Headlamp levelling device (15 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Headlamp
- 2.6% fail on Stop lamp
- 1.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.64% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.64% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.64% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.64% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.64% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.64% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.32% fail on Rear reflectors
-
6.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
(91% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
9.3% fail on
Suspension
(41% better than other 2008 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.2% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.32% fail on Linkage
- 0.32% fail on Ball joint
- 0.32% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
2.9% fail on
Springs
-
2.9% fail on
Coil springs
- 2.9% fail on Coil spring
-
2.9% fail on
Coil springs
-
2.6% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.9% fail on Ball joint
- 0.32% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.32% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.96% fail on Wheel bearings
-
4.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
9.0% fail on
Steering
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
8.3% fail on
Steering linkage components
(3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 8.3% fail on Track rod end (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.64% fail on
Power steering
- 0.32% fail on Operation
- 0.32% fail on Other components
-
8.3% fail on
Steering linkage components
(3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
7.1% fail on
Tyres
- 4.8% fail on Tread depth
- 2.2% fail on Condition
-
4.2% fail on
Visibility
- 2.6% fail on Wipers
- 1.6% fail on Washers
-
0.32% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.32% fail on Windscreen
-
3.5% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
3.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.5% fail on
Spark ignition
- 2.6% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.96% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.32% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.32% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.32% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
3.5% fail on
Spark ignition
-
3.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.9% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 2.2% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.32% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.32% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.32% fail on
Body
- 0.32% fail on Other body component
-
0.64% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.64% fail on Registration plates
-
0.64% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.64% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mazda CX-7 (2007 - 2012)
Sharp styling, handles extremely well for a 4x4, smart and comfortable interior, much more economical 2.2-litre diesel version from 2009.