Mazda CX-5 MOT Results
Registered in 201890.3% pass rate
from 10,182 tests in 2021
(18% better than other 2018 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2018 cars and highlighted areas where the Mazda CX-5 is unusually good or bad.
-
2.8% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
2.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
(48% worse than other 2018 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim (51% worse than other 2018 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(73% worse than other 2018 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(140% worse than other 2018 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Rear fog lamp (140% worse than other 2018 cars)
-
0.0098% fail on
Front fog lamps
- 0.0098% fail on Front fog lamps
-
0.29% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(140% worse than other 2018 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Rear reflectors (4 times worse than other 2018 cars)
-
0.059% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.039% fail on Trailer electrical socket (3 times worse than other 2018 cars)
- 0.0098% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.0098% fail on Horn
- 0.049% fail on Stop lamp (74% better than other 2018 cars)
-
0.039% fail on
Direction indicators
(81% better than other 2018 cars)
-
0.039% fail on
Flashing type
(81% better than other 2018 cars)
- 0.029% fail on Side repeaters (81% better than other 2018 cars)
- 0.0098% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.039% fail on
Flashing type
(81% better than other 2018 cars)
-
0.039% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
(10 times worse than other 2018 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (11 times worse than other 2018 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (86% better than other 2018 cars)
-
0.0098% fail on
Headlamps
- 0.0098% fail on Headlamp
-
2.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
(48% worse than other 2018 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Tyres
(25% better than other 2018 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Condition
- 0.66% fail on Tread depth (52% better than other 2018 cars)
- 0.0098% fail on Size/type
-
2.2% fail on
Brakes
(56% worse than other 2018 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(100% worse than other 2018 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(100% worse than other 2018 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Brake pads (100% worse than other 2018 cars)
- 0.0098% fail on Brake linings
-
0.30% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(71% worse than other 2018 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Brake discs (72% worse than other 2018 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(100% worse than other 2018 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Brake performance
-
0.16% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.16% fail on
Rbt
- 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.029% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.16% fail on
Rbt
-
0.069% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.059% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.0098% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.039% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.029% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.029% fail on
Rbt
- 0.029% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.029% fail on
Rbt
-
0.0098% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.0098% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.0098% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.0098% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.16% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.029% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.0098% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.0098% fail on Electronic braking system
- 0.0098% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.020% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.020% fail on Electronic parking brake
-
0.0098% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.0098% fail on Reservoirs
-
0.0098% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.0098% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
1.9% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(100% worse than other 2018 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Visibility
(57% better than other 2018 cars)
- 0.93% fail on Wipers (60% better than other 2018 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Washers (52% better than other 2018 cars)
-
0.029% fail on
View to rear
- 0.029% fail on Mirrors
-
0.020% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.020% fail on Windscreen
-
0.27% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
0.27% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.18% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.12% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.039% fail on Emissions not tested (5 times worse than other 2018 cars)
- 0.029% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
0.088% fail on
Spark ignition
(67% better than other 2018 cars)
- 0.069% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.0098% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.0098% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.18% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.0098% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.0098% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
0.27% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.18% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.16% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.16% fail on Condition
- 0.020% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (86% better than other 2018 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.12% fail on
Suspension
(67% better than other 2018 cars)
- 0.049% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.039% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.029% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.0098% fail on Linkage
-
0.029% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.0098% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.0098% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.0098% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.069% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(71% better than other 2018 cars)
- 0.069% fail on Registration plates (71% better than other 2018 cars)
-
0.039% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(82% better than other 2018 cars)
-
0.039% fail on
Body
- 0.039% fail on Other body component
- 0.0098% fail on Bumpers
-
0.039% fail on
Body
-
0.020% fail on
Road Wheels
(84% better than other 2018 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mazda CX-5 (2017 on)
Classy and versatile interior. Generous equipment levels. Top-spec GT Sport feels particularly plush. Handling strikes a good balance between sportiness and comfort.