Mazda CX-5 MOT Results
Registered in 201388.5% pass rate
from 4,895 tests in 2017
(32% better than other 2013 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2013 cars and highlighted areas where the Mazda CX-5 is unusually good or bad.
-
3.4% fail on
Tyres
(27% better than other 2013 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Tread depth
- 1.0% fail on Condition (57% better than other 2013 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system (2 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Valve stem (2 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Size/type
-
3.3% fail on
Brakes
-
2.7% fail on
Hub components
(41% worse than other 2013 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Brake pads (47% worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Brake discs
- 0.041% fail on Brake linings
-
0.43% fail on
Brake performance
- 0.27% fail on Rear wheels
- 0.12% fail on Front wheels
- 0.041% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.020% fail on Brake operation
-
0.12% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
0.12% fail on
Components
- 0.12% fail on Hoses
-
0.12% fail on
Components
- 0.061% fail on Electronic stability system
-
0.061% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.061% fail on Condition
- 0.061% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.020% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.020% fail on Cable
-
0.020% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.020% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
- 0.020% fail on ABS
-
2.7% fail on
Hub components
(41% worse than other 2013 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(28% better than other 2013 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Wipers (24% better than other 2013 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Washers (51% better than other 2013 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Windscreen
- 0.041% fail on Mirrors
-
2.3% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(64% better than other 2013 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Headlamp aim (52% better than other 2013 cars)
-
0.35% fail on
Position lamps
(64% better than other 2013 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Front lamps (69% better than other 2013 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Rear lamps
-
0.22% fail on
Headlamps
(78% better than other 2013 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Headlamp (87% better than other 2013 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.10% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
- 0.20% fail on Registration plate lamp (84% better than other 2013 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.16% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.10% fail on Tell tale (11 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Trailer electrical socket (10 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.082% fail on Battery
- 0.082% fail on Stop lamp (92% better than other 2013 cars)
-
0.082% fail on
Direction indicators
(79% better than other 2013 cars)
-
0.082% fail on
Flashing type
(79% better than other 2013 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Side repeaters (78% better than other 2013 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Individual lamps
-
0.082% fail on
Flashing type
(79% better than other 2013 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.020% fail on Horn
-
0.92% fail on
Suspension
(44% better than other 2013 cars)
-
0.37% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(200% worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Linkage condition (15 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.041% fail on Attachment (23 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.20% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.20% fail on Condition
-
0.12% fail on
Coil springs
(75% better than other 2013 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Condition (78% better than other 2013 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Location
-
0.10% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.10% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.041% fail on
Tie bars/rods
(5 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Condition
- 0.020% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.041% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.041% fail on Front
- 0.020% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.020% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.020% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 0.020% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
0.020% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
0.37% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(200% worse than other 2013 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 0.10% fail on Body condition
-
0.061% fail on
Seats
- 0.041% fail on Passengers
- 0.020% fail on Drivers
-
0.020% fail on
Doors
- 0.020% fail on Passengers other
-
0.18% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.18% fail on Registration plate
-
0.041% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.041% fail on Attachment
-
0.041% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(85% better than other 2013 cars)
-
0.020% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.020% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
0.020% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.020% fail on
Installation check
- 0.020% fail on Belt(s)/padding
-
0.020% fail on
Installation check
-
0.020% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
-
0.020% fail on
Steering
-
0.020% fail on
Steering system
- 0.020% fail on Track rod end
-
0.020% fail on
Steering system
-
0.020% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 0.020% fail on Exhaust system
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mazda CX-5 (2012 - 2016)
Economical and efficient. Comfortable ride. Well equipped as standard. Practical and spacious yet compact.