Mazda CX-5 MOT Results

Registered in 2012
86.0% pass rate
from 1,449 tests in 2017
(33% better than other 2012 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 cars and highlighted areas where the Mazda CX-5 is unusually good or bad.

  • 4.6% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.7% fail on Wipers
    • 0.69% fail on Washers
    • 0.21% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.14% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.1% fail on Tyres (27% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.2% fail on Condition (59% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.069% fail on Valve stem
  • 3.7% fail on Brakes
    • 3.0% fail on Hub components
      • 2.8% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.14% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.069% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.90% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.48% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.14% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.14% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.069% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.069% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.069% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.14% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.069% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.069% fail on Components
        • 0.069% fail on Hoses
    • 0.069% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.069% fail on Operation
  • 1.9% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (76% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.83% fail on Headlamp aim (65% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Battery (5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.28% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.28% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.21% fail on Position lamps (86% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Front lamps (82% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Headlamps (85% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.14% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.069% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.14% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.14% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.069% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 0.069% fail on Stop lamp
  • 1.2% fail on Suspension (66% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.69% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.48% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.14% fail on Condition (43 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.069% fail on Linkage condition
    • 0.21% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.21% fail on Condition
    • 0.14% fail on Coil springs (91% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.069% fail on Condition
      • 0.069% fail on Location
    • 0.069% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.069% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.069% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.069% fail on Rear
    • 0.069% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.069% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.069% fail on Constant velocity joints
  • 0.48% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.48% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.21% fail on Steering
    • 0.21% fail on Steering system
      • 0.21% fail on Track rod end
  • 0.14% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.069% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.069% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
    • 0.069% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.069% fail on Condition
  • 0.069% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.069% fail on Seats
      • 0.069% fail on Drivers
  • 0.069% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.069% fail on Emissions not tested
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages