Mazda CX-5 MOT Results
Registered in 201275.3% pass rate
from 1,606 tests in 2021
(18% better than other 2012 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 cars and highlighted areas where the Mazda CX-5 is unusually good or bad.
-
7.3% fail on
Suspension
(22% better than other 2012 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.0% fail on Ball joint
- 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.62% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.12% fail on Suspension arm
-
2.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(87% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 1.00% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.81% fail on Linkage (6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.31% fail on Ball joint
- 0.19% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.062% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.50% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.37% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.12% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (27 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.062% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.062% fail on Ball joint
- 0.25% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.12% fail on
Springs
(97% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Coil springs
(97% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Mounting (5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Coil springs
(97% better than other 2012 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Suspension arms
-
7.0% fail on
Steering
(3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
6.9% fail on
Steering linkage components
(4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 6.8% fail on Track rod end (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.062% fail on Drag link end
- 0.062% fail on Locking devices
-
0.12% fail on
Steering play
- 0.12% fail on Steering rack
-
6.9% fail on
Steering linkage components
(4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
5.5% fail on
Brakes
-
3.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
3.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 3.0% fail on Brake pads
-
0.81% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.81% fail on Brake discs
-
3.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.6% fail on
Brake performance
(38% better than other 2012 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.2% fail on
Rbt
- 0.93% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.31% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.062% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.062% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
1.2% fail on
Rbt
-
0.25% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(75% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Rbt (sp) (74% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.12% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.12% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.12% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.062% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
1.3% fail on
Service brake performance
- 0.44% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.31% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.25% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.12% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.12% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.12% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.062% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.062% fail on Reservoirs
-
3.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
4.0% fail on
Tyres
(28% better than other 2012 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Tread depth
- 1.9% fail on Condition
-
3.5% fail on
Visibility
- 2.4% fail on Wipers
- 1.1% fail on Washers (50% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.062% fail on
View to rear
- 0.062% fail on Mirrors
-
2.6% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(72% better than other 2012 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
(57% better than other 2012 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim (52% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Stop lamp (63% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Headlamps
(89% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Headlamp (91% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.062% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
0.25% fail on
Direction indicators
(85% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Flashing type
(85% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.25% fail on
Flashing type
(85% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.12% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.12% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.12% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.12% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (91% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.062% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.062% fail on Switch
-
0.062% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.062% fail on Electrical wiring
-
1.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
(57% better than other 2012 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
1.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.2% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.62% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (180% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.19% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.062% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
-
0.62% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.31% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.19% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.12% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.2% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.12% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.12% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
0.062% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.062% fail on Undertray
-
1.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.68% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(73% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Exhaust system (62% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Body
- 0.19% fail on Other body component
-
0.12% fail on
Transmission
(88% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.062% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.062% fail on Joints
-
0.062% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.062% fail on Prop shaft
-
0.062% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.31% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.31% fail on Registration plates
-
0.31% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.31% fail on Attachment
-
0.19% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.12% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.062% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.062% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mazda CX-5 (2012 - 2016)
Economical and efficient. Comfortable ride and nimble handling. Well equipped as standard.