Mazda CX-3 MOT Results
Registered in 201791.1% pass rate
from 4,894 tests in 2021
(31% better than other 2017 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Mazda CX-3 is unusually good or bad.
-
3.3% fail on
Visibility
- 2.8% fail on Wipers
- 0.45% fail on Washers (54% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Bonnet
-
2.2% fail on
Tyres
(35% better than other 2017 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Condition
- 0.78% fail on Tread depth (50% better than other 2017 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Brakes
-
1.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.1% fail on Brake pads
- 0.041% fail on Brake linings
-
0.20% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.20% fail on Brake discs
-
1.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.31% fail on
Brake performance
-
0.22% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.18% fail on
Rbt
- 0.10% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.082% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.041% fail on
Plate brake tester
(9 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.041% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (15 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Rbt
-
0.10% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.10% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.061% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.041% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.10% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.020% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.020% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.22% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.041% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.041% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.020% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 0.020% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.020% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.020% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
1.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.2% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(54% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.76% fail on
Headlamp aim
(42% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.76% fail on Headlamp aim (40% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.14% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.14% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.14% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.12% fail on Stop lamp (63% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.10% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.10% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.10% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.041% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (80% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.041% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.020% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.020% fail on Battery(ies)
-
0.020% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.020% fail on Reversing lamps
-
0.76% fail on
Headlamp aim
(42% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.41% fail on
Suspension
(54% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Springs
-
0.20% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.20% fail on Coil spring
-
0.20% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.12% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.061% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.020% fail on Linkage
- 0.020% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.020% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.020% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.20% fail on
Springs
-
0.18% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(66% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(69% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.061% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.041% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (79% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.041% fail on
Compression ignition
(81% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.041% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.12% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.020% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.020% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
0.16% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(69% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.12% fail on Registration plates
-
0.12% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.12% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.12% fail on Condition
-
0.12% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.061% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(80% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.020% fail on
Doors
-
0.020% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.020% fail on Door condition
-
0.020% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
0.020% fail on
Seats
- 0.020% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.041% fail on
Steering
-
0.020% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.020% fail on Steering rack
-
0.020% fail on
Steering play
- 0.020% fail on Steering rack
-
0.020% fail on
Steering gear
-
0.041% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.041% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mazda CX-3 (2015 - 2019)
Enjoyable and good to drive. Good quality interior finish. 2.0-litre petrol is smooth and economical.