Mazda CX-3 MOT Results
Registered in 201583.4% pass rate
from 2,384 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 cars and highlighted areas where the Mazda CX-3 is unusually good or bad.
-
3.8% fail on
Visibility
- 2.6% fail on Wipers
- 1.1% fail on Washers
- 0.042% fail on Bonnet
-
0.042% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.042% fail on Windscreen
-
3.4% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(8 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Seat belts
(16 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Condition (17 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Seat belts
(16 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Suspension
-
3.1% fail on
Springs
(90% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Coil springs
(91% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Coil spring (91% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Coil springs
(91% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.042% fail on Linkage
- 0.042% fail on Ball joint
- 0.042% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.042% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.042% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.042% fail on Pins and bushes
-
3.1% fail on
Springs
(90% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Tyres
- 2.3% fail on Condition
- 1.3% fail on Tread depth (44% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.042% fail on Size/type
-
2.3% fail on
Brakes
(34% better than other 2015 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.5% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.5% fail on Brake pads
-
0.25% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.25% fail on Brake discs
-
1.5% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.55% fail on
Brake performance
(50% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.21% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.17% fail on
Service brake performance
(73% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Rbt
(72% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.084% fail on Service brake performance (84% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.084% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.17% fail on
Rbt
(72% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.13% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.084% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.084% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.042% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.13% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.042% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.21% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
0.084% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.042% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.042% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.084% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.084% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.084% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.042% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
1.6% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.1% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(53% better than other 2015 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim
-
0.34% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.34% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.29% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.042% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.34% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.21% fail on Stop lamp (76% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (70% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Headlamps
(88% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Headlamp (87% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.084% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.084% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.084% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.084% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.042% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.042% fail on Reversing lamps
-
0.042% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.042% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
1.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
0.29% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(74% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(73% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Spark ignition
(74% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.13% fail on
Compression ignition
(73% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.084% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.042% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
- 0.042% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.17% fail on
Spark ignition
(74% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(73% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(77% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.084% fail on
Seats
- 0.084% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.042% fail on
Transmission
-
0.042% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.042% fail on Joints
-
0.042% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.042% fail on
Body
- 0.042% fail on Other body component
- 0.042% fail on Undertray
-
0.084% fail on
Seats
-
0.13% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.13% fail on Registration plates
-
0.084% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.084% fail on Attachment
-
0.042% fail on
Steering
-
0.042% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.042% fail on Track rod end
-
0.042% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.042% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.042% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mazda CX-3 (2015 - 2019)
Enjoyable and good to drive. Good quality interior finish. 2.0-litre petrol is smooth and economical.