Mazda B-Class MOT Results
Registered in 200251.8% pass rate
from 371 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Mazda B-Class is unusually good or bad.
-
27% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
-
11% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 11% fail on Fog lamp (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
8.1% fail on
Position lamps
- 4.9% fail on Rear lamps (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Front lamps
- 7.0% fail on Stop lamp
- 4.6% fail on Headlamp aim
-
3.5% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.5% fail on Headlamp
-
0.27% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.27% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
-
1.9% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.3% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.27% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.27% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.27% fail on Switch
-
1.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.3% fail on Battery
- 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp (81% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.27% fail on Rear reflectors
-
11% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
19% fail on
Suspension
-
8.9% fail on
Drive shafts
(110% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
8.6% fail on
Front drive shafts
(100% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 8.6% fail on Constant velocity joints (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.27% fail on Drive shafts
-
8.6% fail on
Front drive shafts
(100% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 2.4% fail on Spring mounting (14 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Component mounting
- 0.27% fail on Subframe mounting
-
3.5% fail on
Shock absorbers
(140% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Leaf springs
(618 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Condition (1524 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.54% fail on
Pins and bushes
(308 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Shackle (494 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Anchor bracket
- 0.27% fail on Securing bolts
-
3.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.6% fail on Linkage condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.81% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (80% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Condition
- 0.27% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.27% fail on Attachment
-
1.9% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.9% fail on Front
-
1.6% fail on
Suspension arms
(66% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (64% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.27% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.27% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
8.9% fail on
Drive shafts
(110% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
16% fail on
Brakes
-
11% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(70% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
11% fail on
Components
(76% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 6.5% fail on Pipes
- 3.2% fail on Valves (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Hoses
- 0.54% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.54% fail on Leaks
-
11% fail on
Components
(76% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Brake performance
- 3.2% fail on Front wheels
- 1.1% fail on Rear wheels (73% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.54% fail on Parking brake performance (88% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Brake imbalance
-
1.9% fail on
Hub components
- 1.9% fail on Brake pads
- 0.54% fail on Brake discs
-
0.54% fail on
Prescribed areas
(26 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Actuating linkage mounting (158 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.27% fail on Condition
-
0.27% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.27% fail on
Pedal
- 0.27% fail on Condition
-
0.27% fail on
Pedal
- 0.27% fail on Restricted movement
-
11% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(70% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
7.3% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 4.9% fail on Wipers
- 2.7% fail on Washers
- 0.54% fail on Mirrors
-
7.0% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(140% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Body condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Vehicle structure
(3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Chassis (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
Tyres
(47% better than other 2002 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Tread depth
- 1.6% fail on Condition
- 0.27% fail on Size/type
-
4.6% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 3.0% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.1% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.54% fail on Cap
- 0.27% fail on Pipe
- 0.27% fail on System
- 0.81% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.27% fail on Emissions
-
2.2% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 2.2% fail on Registration plate
-
1.9% fail on
Steering
(62% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Steering system
- 1.3% fail on Track rod end
-
0.27% fail on
Free play
- 0.27% fail on Steering box
- 0.27% fail on Drag link end
-
1.9% fail on
Steering system
-
1.3% fail on
Towbars
(24 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Towbar (117 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(67% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.81% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.81% fail on Condition
-
0.54% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.54% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
0.81% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.27% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.27% fail on Attachment