MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mazda » 626 » 2002

Mazda 626 MOT Results

Registered in 2002
56.5% pass rate
from 108 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Mazda 626 is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Suspension
    • 17% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.8% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.93% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.93% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.93% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.93% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.9% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.9% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.93% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.93% fail on Springs
      • 0.93% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.93% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.93% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.93% fail on Ball joint
  • 20% fail on Brakes
    • 14% fail on Brake performance
      • 9.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 9.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.6% fail on Rbt
          • 4.6% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.7% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 3.7% fail on Rbt
          • 2.8% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.93% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.93% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.93% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.93% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.93% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 4.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.9% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.9% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.9% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.93% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.93% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 1.9% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.9% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.93% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.93% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.93% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.93% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.93% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 8.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.7% fail on Chassis (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Chassis condition (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.93% fail on Tank
      • 0.93% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.93% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.93% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.93% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.93% fail on Transmission
      • 0.93% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.93% fail on Joints
  • 5.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.6% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.93% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 5.6% fail on Tyres
    • 3.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.9% fail on Condition
  • 2.8% fail on Visibility
    • 2.8% fail on Wipers
  • 1.9% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.93% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.93% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.93% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.93% fail on Emissions not tested

Search Good Garages