Mazda 626 MOT Results
Registered in 200249.4% pass rate
from 403 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Mazda 626 is unusually good or bad.
-
25% fail on
Brakes
(50% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
(63% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 8.2% fail on Parking brake performance (84% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 5.7% fail on Front wheels (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Rear wheels
- 0.99% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.50% fail on Service brake performance
-
8.9% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
6.9% fail on
Components
- 5.5% fail on Hoses (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Pipes (60% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Leaks (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
6.9% fail on
Components
-
6.2% fail on
Hub components
(90% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Brake pads (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Brake discs
- 0.50% fail on Brake calipers
- 2.5% fail on ABS
-
0.99% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.99% fail on Condition
- 0.50% fail on Electronic stability system
- 0.50% fail on Restricted movement
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
(63% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
22% fail on
Suspension
-
15% fail on
Prescribed areas
(3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 11% fail on Component mounting (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Subframe mounting (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.99% fail on Spring mounting (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
7.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 3.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 2.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Linkage condition (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Suspension arms
(64% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (62% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.99% fail on
Drive shafts
(77% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.99% fail on
Front drive shafts
(77% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.99% fail on Constant velocity joints (76% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.99% fail on
Front drive shafts
(77% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.50% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.50% fail on Condition
-
0.50% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.25% fail on Front
- 0.25% fail on Rear
-
0.50% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.50% fail on Condition
-
0.25% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.25% fail on Condition
-
0.25% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.25% fail on Condition
-
15% fail on
Prescribed areas
(3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
20% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(27% better than other 2002 cars)
- 6.9% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
4.7% fail on
Position lamps
- 3.7% fail on Front lamps
- 1.2% fail on Rear lamps
- 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim (54% better than other 2002 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.0% fail on Headlamp
- 2.7% fail on Stop lamp (57% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.99% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.25% fail on All direction indicators
-
1.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.99% fail on Battery
-
0.50% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.50% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.25% fail on Tell tale
- 0.25% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.25% fail on Horn
-
9.4% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(130% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
8.2% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 7.9% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Condition
-
1.2% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 1.2% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
8.2% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
7.9% fail on
Tyres
- 4.0% fail on Condition
- 4.0% fail on Tread depth
- 0.50% fail on Size/type
- 0.50% fail on Valve stem
-
6.9% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(140% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 4.5% fail on Body condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Vehicle structure
(3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Chassis (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.50% fail on
Doors
- 0.50% fail on Passengers other
-
0.25% fail on
Seats
- 0.25% fail on Passengers
-
6.0% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.0% fail on Wipers
- 0.99% fail on Washers (73% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Windscreen
-
3.0% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
(160% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Registration plate (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(69% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Emissions
- 0.99% fail on Exhaust system (78% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.74% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.50% fail on Tank
- 0.25% fail on System
-
1.7% fail on
Steering
(65% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Steering system
(66% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Track rod end
- 0.25% fail on Ball joint
-
0.25% fail on
Power steering
- 0.25% fail on Operation
-
1.5% fail on
Steering system
(66% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.50% fail on
Towbars
(8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Vehicle structure (10 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.50% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.50% fail on Attachment