Mazda 626 MOT Results
Registered in 200060.9% pass rate
from 128 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Mazda 626 is unusually good or bad.
-
13% fail on
Brakes
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
-
6.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 6.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
4.7% fail on
Service brake performance
-
4.7% fail on
Rbt
- 4.7% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
4.7% fail on
Rbt
-
4.7% fail on
Parking brake performance
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Rbt
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Parking brake performance
- 1.6% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (12 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Rbt
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.78% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.78% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.78% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.78% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
6.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
3.1% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
3.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 3.1% fail on Brake pads
-
0.78% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.78% fail on Brake discs
-
3.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
2.3% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 2.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
-
13% fail on
Suspension
-
6.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 4.7% fail on Linkage ball joints (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.78% fail on Linkage
- 0.78% fail on Ball joint
- 5.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
2.3% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.3% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.6% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.78% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.78% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.78% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
6.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
11% fail on
Visibility
- 6.3% fail on Wipers
- 4.7% fail on Washers
-
10% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
3.9% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.1% fail on Headlamp
- 0.78% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 3.1% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.6% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
1.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.6% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.6% fail on Battery(ies)
-
0.78% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.78% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.78% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.78% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
3.9% fail on
Headlamps
-
4.7% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
2.3% fail on
Transmission
-
1.6% fail on
Prop shafts
(6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Joints (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.78% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.78% fail on Joints
-
1.6% fail on
Prop shafts
(6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.78% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 0.78% fail on Strengthening plate
-
1.6% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.78% fail on Tank
- 0.78% fail on Pipe
- 0.78% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.3% fail on
Transmission
-
3.1% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
3.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.1% fail on
Spark ignition
- 2.3% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.78% fail on Emissions not tested
-
3.1% fail on
Spark ignition
-
3.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.1% fail on
Tyres
- 2.3% fail on Tread depth
- 0.78% fail on Condition
-
2.3% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
2.3% fail on
Seat belts
- 2.3% fail on Prescribed areas
-
2.3% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.6% fail on
Steering
-
1.6% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.6% fail on Track rod end
-
1.6% fail on
Steering linkage components