Mazda 626 MOT Results

Registered in 2000
53.6% pass rate
from 455 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Mazda 626 is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Brakes
    • 13% fail on Brake performance (44% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 9.5% fail on Parking brake performance (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.4% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.88% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.44% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.22% fail on Service brake performance
    • 4.8% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 4.2% fail on Components
        • 2.6% fail on Hoses
        • 1.8% fail on Pipes (57% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.22% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.88% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Leaks
    • 4.8% fail on Hub components
      • 3.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.3% fail on Brake calipers (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on ABS (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.44% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.44% fail on Condition
    • 0.22% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.22% fail on Pedal
        • 0.22% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.22% fail on Restricted movement
  • 20% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.2% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 5.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.0% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.44% fail on Rear lamps
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.9% fail on Stop lamp (49% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.8% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.44% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.44% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.22% fail on Tell tales
    • 0.66% fail on Battery
    • 0.22% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.22% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.22% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.22% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 7.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 6.6% fail on Component mounting (66% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.44% fail on Spring mounting
    • 5.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 4.8% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.66% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.44% fail on Linkage condition
    • 2.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.22% fail on Condition
    • 2.4% fail on Drive shafts
      • 2.2% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 2.2% fail on Constant velocity joints
      • 0.22% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.22% fail on Drive shafts
    • 0.44% fail on Coil springs (86% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Condition (85% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.44% fail on Condition
    • 0.44% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.44% fail on Condition
    • 0.44% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.22% fail on Front
      • 0.22% fail on Rear
    • 0.44% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.44% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.44% fail on Condition
    • 0.22% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.22% fail on Condition
    • 0.22% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.22% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.22% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 9.9% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.9% fail on Wipers
    • 3.7% fail on Washers
    • 0.44% fail on Windscreen
  • 9.0% fail on Tyres
    • 5.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.22% fail on Size/type
  • 6.6% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (40% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Emissions
    • 2.0% fail on Exhaust system (62% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.1% fail on Tank (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Cap
      • 0.22% fail on System
  • 5.5% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 3.5% fail on Body condition (100% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 2.0% fail on Chassis
    • 0.22% fail on Seats
      • 0.22% fail on Passengers
  • 5.3% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 4.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.22% fail on Condition
      • 0.22% fail on Attachment
    • 1.3% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.3% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 2.2% fail on Steering (53% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Steering system
      • 1.8% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.22% fail on Locking devices
  • 1.8% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.44% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.44% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages