Mazda 626 MOT Results
Registered in 199955.4% pass rate
from 130 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Mazda 626 is unusually good or bad.
-
24% fail on
Brakes
(88% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
17% fail on
Brake performance
(130% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
9.2% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(180% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 9.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (190% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
6.9% fail on
Service brake performance
(150% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
6.9% fail on
Rbt
(160% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 6.2% fail on Service brake performance (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.77% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
6.9% fail on
Rbt
(160% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
6.2% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
6.2% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(150% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 5.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.77% fail on Service brake performance
-
6.2% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(150% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
3.1% fail on
Rbt
- 3.1% fail on Parking brake performance
-
3.1% fail on
Rbt
-
9.2% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(180% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 3.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.77% fail on Electronic stability control
- 2.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.5% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Reservoirs (48 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.5% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.5% fail on Brake pads
-
1.5% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.77% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.77% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
17% fail on
Brake performance
(130% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
15% fail on
Suspension
- 9.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
5.4% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.3% fail on Suspension arm (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Ball joint
- 1.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
3.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.3% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.77% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.77% fail on Linkage
- 0.77% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.77% fail on
Springs
- 0.77% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
8.5% fail on
Visibility
- 6.2% fail on Wipers
- 2.3% fail on Washers
-
8.5% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 4.6% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
-
1.5% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.5% fail on Headlamp
- 0.77% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
7.7% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
4.6% fail on
Transmission
-
4.6% fail on
Drive shafts
- 4.6% fail on Joints
-
4.6% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.77% fail on
Chassis
- 0.77% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.77% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.77% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.77% fail on Tank
-
0.77% fail on
Doors
-
0.77% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.77% fail on Door condition
-
0.77% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.77% fail on Floor
-
4.6% fail on
Transmission
-
5.4% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
4.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.6% fail on
Spark ignition
- 4.6% fail on Catalyst emissions
-
4.6% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.77% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.77% fail on Other leaks
-
4.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.4% fail on
Tyres
- 4.6% fail on Condition
- 0.77% fail on Tread depth
-
3.1% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
3.1% fail on
Seat belts
- 3.1% fail on Prescribed areas
-
3.1% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.5% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.5% fail on Registration plates
-
1.5% fail on
Steering
-
1.5% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.5% fail on Track rod end
-
1.5% fail on
Steering linkage components