Mazda 626 MOT Results

Registered in 1999
55.4% pass rate
from 130 tests in 2021
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Mazda 626 is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Brakes (88% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 17% fail on Brake performance (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 9.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 9.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (190% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 6.9% fail on Service brake performance (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 6.9% fail on Rbt (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 6.2% fail on Service brake performance (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 0.77% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 6.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 6.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 5.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 0.77% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.1% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 3.1% fail on Rbt
          • 3.1% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 3.1% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 3.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.77% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 2.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.5% fail on Hydraulic systems (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Reservoirs (48 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.5% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.77% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.77% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 15% fail on Suspension
    • 9.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 5.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.3% fail on Suspension arm (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 3.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.3% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.77% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.77% fail on Linkage
    • 0.77% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.77% fail on Springs
      • 0.77% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
  • 8.5% fail on Visibility
    • 6.2% fail on Wipers
    • 2.3% fail on Washers
  • 8.5% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.77% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
  • 7.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.6% fail on Transmission
      • 4.6% fail on Drive shafts
        • 4.6% fail on Joints
    • 0.77% fail on Chassis
      • 0.77% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.77% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.77% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.77% fail on Tank
    • 0.77% fail on Doors
      • 0.77% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.77% fail on Door condition
    • 0.77% fail on Floor
  • 5.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.6% fail on Spark ignition
        • 4.6% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.77% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.77% fail on Other leaks
  • 5.4% fail on Tyres
    • 4.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.77% fail on Tread depth
  • 3.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.1% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.5% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.5% fail on Steering
    • 1.5% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.5% fail on Track rod end

Search Good Garages