MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mazda » 6 » 2004

Mazda 6 MOT Results

Registered in 2004
50.6% pass rate
from 1,023 tests in 2021
(10% worse than other 2004 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the Mazda 6 is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Suspension (41% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 15% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 8.2% fail on Suspension arms (42% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.4% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.3% fail on Suspension arm (200% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (33% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.59% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.49% fail on Linkage
      • 0.49% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.39% fail on Linkage ball joints (76% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.098% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.098% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.8% fail on Springs
      • 2.6% fail on Coil springs (38% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.20% fail on Mounting
      • 0.29% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Sub-frames (150% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.49% fail on Wheel bearings (67% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.20% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.098% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.098% fail on Ball joint
  • 18% fail on Brakes (31% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 13% fail on Brake performance (69% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 7.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (76% worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 7.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (86% worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.098% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 5.1% fail on Service brake performance (71% worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 5.1% fail on Rbt (76% worse than other 2004 cars)
          • 4.7% fail on Service brake performance (90% worse than other 2004 cars)
          • 0.68% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 4.1% fail on Parking brake performance (150% worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 4.0% fail on Rbt (150% worse than other 2004 cars)
          • 3.5% fail on Parking brake performance (150% worse than other 2004 cars)
          • 0.49% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.098% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.098% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.98% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.98% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.78% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.29% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.29% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.6% fail on Mechanical brake components (52% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Brake linings and pads (120% worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 4.3% fail on Brake pads (120% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.98% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.098% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.098% fail on Pivot
    • 1.8% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.6% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.49% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 1.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (56% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.59% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.49% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.098% fail on Pedal
    • 0.49% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.49% fail on Lever
    • 0.39% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.29% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.20% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.098% fail on Valves
    • 0.20% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.20% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.098% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.098% fail on Servos
  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.7% fail on Headlamps (43% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Headlamp
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp levelling device (6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.59% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.78% fail on Direction indicators (70% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Flashing type (70% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.39% fail on Individual direction indicators (76% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.098% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.49% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.39% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.098% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.29% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (77% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Rear fog lamp (77% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Rear fog lamp (77% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.098% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.098% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 2.9% fail on Chassis (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Chassis condition (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Exhaust system (48% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.78% fail on Transmission (77% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Drive shafts (76% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.78% fail on Joints (76% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.78% fail on Body (170% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Panel
      • 0.39% fail on Other body component
    • 0.39% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.20% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.20% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.20% fail on Floor (6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Cabs
      • 0.20% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.098% fail on Doors
      • 0.098% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.098% fail on Door condition
    • 0.098% fail on Seats
      • 0.098% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 8.9% fail on Visibility
    • 6.5% fail on Wipers (54% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.098% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.098% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.098% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.098% fail on View to rear
      • 0.098% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (88% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Condition
      • 0.098% fail on Requirements
    • 0.88% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 4.9% fail on Tyres
    • 2.7% fail on Condition
    • 2.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.098% fail on Size/type
  • 4.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (43% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Exhaust emissions (43% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Spark ignition (48% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (63% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.39% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.098% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.098% fail on Catalytic converter
          • 0.098% fail on Oxygen sensor
        • 0.098% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 1.1% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.68% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.29% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.098% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 0.20% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.20% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.98% fail on Steering (78% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.39% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.39% fail on Power steering
      • 0.20% fail on Operation
      • 0.20% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.098% fail on Other components
    • 0.29% fail on Steering linkage components (91% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Track rod end (90% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Ball joint
  • 0.98% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.98% fail on Attachment (180% worse than other 2004 cars)
  • 0.68% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.68% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.098% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.098% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review

  • Mazda 6 (2002 - 2007)
    A very enjoyable drive, with excellent handling and some fine engines. Large luggage bay. Brilliant 'Karakuri' rear seat folding of hatch and estate.

    Search Good Garages