Mazda 6 MOT Results
Registered in 200251.7% pass rate
from 205 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Mazda 6 is unusually good or bad.
-
24% fail on
Suspension
(46% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 13% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
7.8% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.4% fail on Suspension arm (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Ball joint
- 2.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 1.5% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.98% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (16 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.5% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.49% fail on Linkage
- 0.49% fail on Ball joint
- 0.49% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
2.4% fail on
Springs
-
2.0% fail on
Coil springs
- 2.0% fail on Coil spring
- 0.49% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
2.0% fail on
Coil springs
-
2.4% fail on
Sub-frames
(3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Suspension rods
(16 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Suspension rod (93 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.98% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.49% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.49% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.49% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.49% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.49% fail on Ball joint
-
17% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
6.3% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.9% fail on Headlamp
- 1.5% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 6.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (190% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 5.9% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.9% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.98% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.49% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.49% fail on Switch
- 0.49% fail on Rear reflectors
-
6.3% fail on
Headlamps
-
15% fail on
Brakes
-
7.8% fail on
Brake performance
-
4.9% fail on
Service brake performance
-
4.4% fail on
Rbt
- 3.9% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.49% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.49% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.49% fail on Service brake performance
-
4.4% fail on
Rbt
-
3.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 3.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
2.4% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
2.4% fail on
Rbt
- 2.4% fail on Parking brake performance
-
2.4% fail on
Rbt
-
0.49% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.49% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.49% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.49% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
4.9% fail on
Service brake performance
-
5.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
4.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(140% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Brake pads (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.5% fail on Brake discs
-
0.49% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.49% fail on Brake slack adjuster
-
4.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(140% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.49% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.49% fail on Hand lever
-
0.49% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.49% fail on Lever
-
0.49% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.49% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.49% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.49% fail on Electronic stability control
-
7.8% fail on
Brake performance
-
9.3% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
3.9% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Transmission
-
2.4% fail on
Drive shafts
- 2.4% fail on Joints
-
2.4% fail on
Drive shafts
- 2.0% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.98% fail on
Chassis
- 0.98% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.49% fail on Bumpers
-
0.49% fail on
Body
- 0.49% fail on Panel
-
3.9% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
9.3% fail on
Tyres
- 5.9% fail on Condition (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Tread depth
-
7.3% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(100% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Seat belts
- 3.4% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.98% fail on Condition
- 0.49% fail on Requirements
- 3.9% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
4.4% fail on
Seat belts
-
6.8% fail on
Visibility
- 5.4% fail on Wipers
- 1.5% fail on Washers
-
1.5% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(80% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(78% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Spark ignition
(75% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.5% fail on
Spark ignition
(75% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(78% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.98% fail on
Steering
-
0.98% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.98% fail on Track rod end
-
0.98% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.98% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.98% fail on Attachment
-
0.49% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.49% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mazda 6 (2002 - 2007)
A very enjoyable drive, with excellent handling and some fine engines. Large luggage bay. Brilliant 'Karakuri' rear seat folding of hatch and estate.