Mazda 5 MOT Results
Registered in 201365.1% pass rate
from 799 tests in 2021
(31% worse than other 2013 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2013 cars and highlighted areas where the Mazda 5 is unusually good or bad.
-
16% fail on
Suspension
(110% worse than other 2013 cars)
-
11% fail on
Suspension arms
(3 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 7.0% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.13% fail on Suspension arm
-
5.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(5 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Linkage ball joints (7 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.88% fail on Ball joint (9 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Linkage (6 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.9% fail on Shock absorbers (4 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.25% fail on Ball joint
- 0.13% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.13% fail on
Springs
-
0.13% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.13% fail on Coil spring
-
0.13% fail on
Coil springs
-
11% fail on
Suspension arms
(3 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
8.4% fail on
Tyres
(64% worse than other 2013 cars)
- 5.4% fail on Condition (110% worse than other 2013 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Tread depth
- 0.13% fail on Size/type
-
6.1% fail on
Brakes
-
4.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(66% worse than other 2013 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(95% worse than other 2013 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Brake pads (90% worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Brake linings
-
0.88% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.88% fail on Brake discs
-
3.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(95% worse than other 2013 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Brake performance
-
1.0% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.0% fail on
Rbt
- 1.0% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.25% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.0% fail on
Rbt
-
0.25% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.25% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.13% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.13% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.13% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
1.0% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.13% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.13% fail on Lever
- 0.13% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.13% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.13% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.13% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.13% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
4.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(66% worse than other 2013 cars)
-
5.6% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
2.1% fail on
Reversing lamps
(11 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Reversing lamps (11 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Reversing lamp switch
-
1.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.3% fail on Stop lamp
-
0.38% fail on
Headlamps
(82% better than other 2013 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Headlamp (81% better than other 2013 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Position lamps
(6 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Position lamp (6 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.25% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.25% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.13% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.13% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.25% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.13% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.13% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.13% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.13% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.13% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.13% fail on Horn
-
2.1% fail on
Reversing lamps
(11 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
5.5% fail on
Visibility
- 4.1% fail on Wipers (88% worse than other 2013 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Washers
-
0.13% fail on
View to rear
- 0.13% fail on Indirect vision devices
-
2.6% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 1.3% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.50% fail on
Transmission
-
0.50% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.50% fail on Joints
-
0.50% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.38% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.38% fail on Tank (26 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Engine mounting
(15 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Engine mounting condition (21 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Towbar
- 0.13% fail on Towbar condition
-
0.13% fail on
Body
- 0.13% fail on Other body component
-
0.13% fail on
Doors
-
0.13% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.13% fail on Door condition
-
0.13% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
1.8% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
1.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.3% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.88% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.38% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.25% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.38% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.25% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.13% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.3% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.13% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.13% fail on Undertray
-
1.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.0% fail on
Steering
-
0.63% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.50% fail on Track rod end
- 0.13% fail on Ball joint
-
0.25% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.25% fail on Steering rack
-
0.13% fail on
Power steering
- 0.13% fail on Operation
-
0.63% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
1.0% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.88% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.88% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.13% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.88% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other 2013 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.38% fail on Registration plates
-
0.38% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.38% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mazda 5 (2010 - 2015)
Seven seats. Sliding side doors. Compliant suspension is superb on poor road surfaces.