Mazda 5 MOT Results
Registered in 201269.2% pass rate
from 868 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 cars and highlighted areas where the Mazda 5 is unusually good or bad.
-
12% fail on
Suspension
-
6.9% fail on
Suspension arms
(120% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Pins and bushes (200% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Ball joint (140% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(140% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Linkage ball joints (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.92% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.69% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.35% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.12% fail on Linkage
- 2.0% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.23% fail on Ball joint
-
0.12% fail on
Springs
-
0.12% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.12% fail on Coil spring
-
0.12% fail on
Coil springs
-
6.9% fail on
Suspension arms
(120% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Tyres
- 3.9% fail on Condition
- 3.0% fail on Tread depth
-
5.5% fail on
Visibility
- 4.4% fail on Wipers (92% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Washers
-
5.2% fail on
Brakes
-
3.7% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
3.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 3.0% fail on Brake pads
-
1.0% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.0% fail on Brake discs
-
3.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.3% fail on
Brake performance
(52% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.58% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.58% fail on
Rbt
- 0.46% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.12% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.58% fail on
Rbt
-
0.58% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.58% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.35% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.23% fail on
Rbt
- 0.12% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.12% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.12% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.12% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.23% fail on
Rbt
-
0.23% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.23% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.12% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.12% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.23% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.58% fail on
Service brake performance
- 0.23% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.23% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.23% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.12% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.12% fail on Lever
-
3.7% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
5.0% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(46% better than other 2012 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.12% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
1.2% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.0% fail on Headlamp
- 0.12% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
1.2% fail on
Reversing lamps
(5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Reversing lamps (5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.92% fail on Stop lamp
- 0.69% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.23% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.23% fail on Position lamp
-
0.23% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.23% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.23% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.23% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
1.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
3.5% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(68% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(72% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Spark ignition
(110% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.69% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.23% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.12% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.12% fail on Oxygen sensor
- 0.12% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.69% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.23% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.23% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.12% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.12% fail on Emissions not tested
-
2.6% fail on
Spark ignition
(110% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.12% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
3.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(72% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 1.6% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.35% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.35% fail on Tank (15 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Bumpers
-
0.35% fail on
Transmission
-
0.35% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.35% fail on Joints
-
0.35% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.35% fail on Undertray (10 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.12% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
0.12% fail on
Doors
-
0.12% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.12% fail on Door condition
-
0.12% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.81% fail on
Steering
-
0.58% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.58% fail on Track rod end
-
0.12% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.12% fail on Steering rack
-
0.12% fail on
Power steering
- 0.12% fail on Operation
-
0.58% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.81% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.58% fail on Attachment
- 0.23% fail on Condition
-
0.23% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.23% fail on Registration plates
-
0.23% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.12% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.12% fail on Condition
- 0.12% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.12% fail on
Seat belts
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mazda 5 (2010 - 2015)
Seven seats. Sliding side doors. Compliant suspension is superb on poor road surfaces.