Mazda 5 MOT Results
Registered in 200646.5% pass rate
from 1,662 tests in 2021
(22% worse than other 2006 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 cars and highlighted areas where the Mazda 5 is unusually good or bad.
-
29% fail on
Suspension
(71% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
14% fail on
Suspension arms
(160% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 7.8% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Ball joint (190% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.42% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.24% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
11% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(120% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Linkage ball joints (160% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (100% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.18% fail on Linkage
- 0.18% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.12% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.12% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 4.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Springs
(32% better than other 2006 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Coil springs
(32% better than other 2006 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Coil spring (32% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
3.4% fail on
Coil springs
(32% better than other 2006 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Sub-frames
(130% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.12% fail on Ball joint (19 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.78% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.48% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.30% fail on Ball joint
- 0.18% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.24% fail on
Axles
- 0.18% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
- 0.060% fail on Axle
-
0.12% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.12% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.060% fail on
Air/gas/fluid suspension
- 0.060% fail on Suspension unit
-
14% fail on
Suspension arms
(160% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
16% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
8.4% fail on
Headlamps
(77% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 8.3% fail on Headlamp (83% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
4.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.4% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (51% better than other 2006 cars)
-
0.48% fail on
Position lamps
(170% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Position lamp (190% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.36% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.30% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.060% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.30% fail on
Direction indicators
(89% better than other 2006 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Flashing type
(89% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Side repeaters (75% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Individual direction indicators (93% better than other 2006 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Flashing type
(89% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Rear reflectors
-
8.4% fail on
Headlamps
(77% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
15% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(88% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 7.2% fail on Exhaust system (170% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Transmission
(56% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Drive shafts
(63% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 5.2% fail on Joints (65% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.060% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.060% fail on Joints
-
5.2% fail on
Drive shafts
(63% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Sub-frame
- 0.12% fail on Sub-frame condition
-
1.0% fail on
Chassis
(2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Chassis condition (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Bumpers (170% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.48% fail on
Doors
-
0.48% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.48% fail on Door condition
-
0.48% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.30% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.18% fail on Tank
- 0.060% fail on Pipe
- 0.060% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.30% fail on
Body
- 0.12% fail on Panel
- 0.12% fail on Other body component
- 0.060% fail on Body condition
-
0.18% fail on
Cabs
(7 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Undertray
-
0.12% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.060% fail on Engine mounting condition
- 0.060% fail on Bracket
- 0.060% fail on Floor
-
0.060% fail on
Seats
- 0.060% fail on Passenger's seat
-
13% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(110% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
13% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(110% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
12% fail on
Spark ignition
(160% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 6.1% fail on Catalyst emissions (190% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 4.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (91% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
1.1% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.54% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.24% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.18% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.12% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.060% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.060% fail on Other emission control equipment
- 0.060% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.060% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
12% fail on
Spark ignition
(160% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.12% fail on Sound deadening material (14 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.12% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
13% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(110% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
12% fail on
Tyres
(86% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 7.3% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 5.4% fail on Tread depth (44% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Size/type
-
11% fail on
Brakes
-
5.1% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(59% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(100% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Brake pads (100% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.2% fail on Brake discs
-
4.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(100% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Brake performance
(38% better than other 2006 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(44% better than other 2006 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (42% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
-
1.4% fail on
Service brake performance
(48% better than other 2006 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
(48% better than other 2006 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (53% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.12% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.12% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
(48% better than other 2006 cars)
-
0.84% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.78% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.60% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.30% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.060% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.060% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.78% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.66% fail on
Parking brake performance
(57% better than other 2006 cars)
-
0.66% fail on
Rbt
(55% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.66% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.060% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.060% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.66% fail on
Rbt
(55% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
2.1% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(44% better than other 2006 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.72% fail on Electronic stability control (120% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.66% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.12% fail on Electronic braking system
-
0.72% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Brake fluid (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Reservoirs (12 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Master cylinder
-
0.60% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
(160% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.42% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.30% fail on Pedal
- 0.12% fail on Hand lever
- 0.24% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.18% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.18% fail on Lever
- 0.12% fail on Rigid brake pipes (95% better than other 2006 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(59% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
8.5% fail on
Visibility
- 5.1% fail on Wipers (52% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Washers
-
0.42% fail on
Condition of glass
(180% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Windscreen (190% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Driver's view (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
View to rear
- 0.12% fail on Mirrors
- 0.060% fail on Bonnet
-
3.9% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(62% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Seat belts
(170% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Prescribed areas (160% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Condition (180% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Requirements (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.66% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.12% fail on
Airbags
- 0.12% fail on Drivers airbag
-
3.2% fail on
Seat belts
(170% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Steering
(41% better than other 2006 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Steering linkage components
(43% better than other 2006 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Track rod end (51% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Ball joint
- 0.18% fail on Drag link end
-
0.42% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.42% fail on Steering rack
-
0.12% fail on
Power steering
- 0.12% fail on Operation
- 0.060% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.060% fail on Prescribed areas
-
1.4% fail on
Steering linkage components
(43% better than other 2006 cars)
-
0.90% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.90% fail on Registration plates
-
0.66% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.60% fail on Attachment
- 0.060% fail on Condition
-
0.060% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.060% fail on Anchorages
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mazda 5 (2005 - 2010)
Sliding side doors, can carry seven people in comfort, well styled, rearmost seats fold flat into the floor, five-star crash test rating.