Mazda 5 MOT Results
Registered in 200544.1% pass rate
from 485 tests in 2021
(28% worse than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Mazda 5 is unusually good or bad.
-
31% fail on
Suspension
(77% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
15% fail on
Suspension arms
(150% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 8.9% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 6.0% fail on Ball joint (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
12% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(120% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Linkage ball joints (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.62% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.21% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.21% fail on Pins and bushes
- 5.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
Springs
-
4.9% fail on
Coil springs
- 4.7% fail on Coil spring
- 0.21% fail on Mounting
-
4.9% fail on
Coil springs
- 3.7% fail on Shock absorbers (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.82% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.62% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.21% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
0.62% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.41% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.21% fail on Ball joint
-
0.41% fail on
Axles
- 0.41% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
-
15% fail on
Suspension arms
(150% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
21% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(29% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
12% fail on
Headlamps
(120% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 12% fail on Headlamp (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 6.0% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.0% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.62% fail on
Direction indicators
(77% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.62% fail on
Flashing type
(76% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.21% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.62% fail on
Flashing type
(76% better than other 2005 cars)
-
12% fail on
Headlamps
(120% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
19% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(180% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
19% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(190% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
18% fail on
Spark ignition
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 8.9% fail on Catalyst emissions (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 6.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Emissions not tested (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Non catalyst emissions (19 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.82% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.41% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.21% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.21% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
18% fail on
Spark ignition
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.41% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.21% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.21% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
-
19% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(190% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
17% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(100% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 7.0% fail on Exhaust system (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
7.0% fail on
Transmission
(97% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
7.0% fail on
Drive shafts
(110% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 7.0% fail on Joints (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
7.0% fail on
Drive shafts
(110% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Chassis
- 1.0% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.62% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.41% fail on Tank
- 0.21% fail on Pipe
-
0.62% fail on
Doors
-
0.41% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.41% fail on Door condition
-
0.21% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.21% fail on Door condition
-
0.41% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.41% fail on Bumpers
- 0.21% fail on Floor
-
10% fail on
Brakes
-
4.3% fail on
Brake performance
(41% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt
- 1.0% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.82% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt
-
1.6% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(60% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (57% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.82% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.82% fail on
Rbt
- 0.62% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.21% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.82% fail on
Rbt
-
0.41% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.41% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.41% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.41% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.41% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
1.6% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.9% fail on Brake pads
-
0.62% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.62% fail on Brake discs
-
2.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.9% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 1.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.82% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.82% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.62% fail on Reservoirs (22 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.41% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.41% fail on Pedal
- 0.21% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
4.3% fail on
Brake performance
(41% better than other 2005 cars)
-
9.1% fail on
Visibility
- 6.0% fail on Wipers
- 3.1% fail on Washers
-
0.21% fail on
View to rear
- 0.21% fail on Mirrors
-
8.9% fail on
Tyres
- 4.9% fail on Condition
- 4.5% fail on Tread depth
- 0.41% fail on Size/type
-
4.3% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
4.1% fail on
Seat belts
(200% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Prescribed areas (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Requirements
- 0.21% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
4.1% fail on
Seat belts
(200% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.82% fail on
Steering
(79% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.82% fail on
Steering linkage components
(71% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.62% fail on Track rod end (76% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Drag link end
-
0.82% fail on
Steering linkage components
(71% better than other 2005 cars)
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mazda 5 (2005 - 2010)
Sliding side doors, can carry seven people in comfort, well styled, rearmost seats fold flat into the floor, five-star crash test rating.