Mazda 323 MOT Results
Registered in 199949.8% pass rate
from 1,122 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Mazda 323 is unusually good or bad.
-
28% fail on
Suspension
(29% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
15% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 11% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.089% fail on Condition
- 0.089% fail on Attachment
-
9.7% fail on
Prescribed areas
(60% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 8.3% fail on Component mounting (72% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Subframe mounting
- 0.71% fail on Spring mounting
-
5.1% fail on
Suspension arms
- 4.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.18% fail on Attachment
-
3.2% fail on
Shock absorbers
(100% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Condition (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.71% fail on
Wheel bearings
(62% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Rear
- 0.27% fail on Front
-
0.53% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.36% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.18% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Drive shafts
(86% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Front drive shafts
(86% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Constant velocity joints (86% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Front drive shafts
(86% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.36% fail on
Coil springs
(87% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Location (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.089% fail on Condition
- 0.089% fail on Attachment
-
0.089% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.089% fail on Condition
-
0.089% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.089% fail on Condition
-
15% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
21% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 6.1% fail on Stop lamp
-
5.0% fail on
Headlamps
- 5.0% fail on Headlamp
-
4.4% fail on
Position lamps
(31% better than other 1999 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Front lamps
- 0.98% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.089% fail on All position lamps
- 4.3% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim (36% better than other 1999 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.7% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.1% fail on Individual lamps (69% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.53% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.089% fail on Side repeaters
-
3.7% fail on
Flashing type
-
2.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(90% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Fog lamp (84% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Switch (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Tell tale
- 0.36% fail on Battery (68% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.089% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.089% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.089% fail on Switch
- 0.089% fail on Horn
-
17% fail on
Brakes
-
8.0% fail on
Brake performance
- 3.7% fail on Front wheels
- 3.5% fail on Parking brake performance
- 2.9% fail on Rear wheels
- 0.62% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.53% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.089% fail on Brake operation
-
4.7% fail on
Hub components
(69% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Brake pads (69% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Brake discs
- 0.45% fail on Brake calipers
-
4.4% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(35% better than other 1999 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
Components
(36% better than other 1999 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Pipes
- 0.89% fail on Hoses
- 0.089% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.53% fail on Leaks
- 0.18% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
4.0% fail on
Components
(36% better than other 1999 cars)
- 3.3% fail on ABS (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.5% fail on Condition
- 0.36% fail on Electronic stability system
-
0.089% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.089% fail on
Pedal
- 0.089% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.089% fail on
Pedal
-
0.089% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.089% fail on Cable
- 0.089% fail on Restricted movement
-
8.0% fail on
Brake performance
-
12% fail on
Tyres
(50% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 7.3% fail on Tread depth (50% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Condition (56% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Size/type
- 0.27% fail on Valve stem
-
8.8% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.1% fail on Wipers
- 3.1% fail on Washers
- 0.80% fail on Mirrors
- 0.36% fail on Bonnet
- 0.27% fail on Windscreen
-
8.4% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(27% better than other 1999 cars)
- 6.7% fail on Emissions
- 2.3% fail on Exhaust system (55% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.62% fail on Emissions not tested
-
4.5% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
3.7% fail on
Seat belts
- 3.3% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.18% fail on Requirements
- 0.18% fail on Condition
-
0.98% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.80% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
- 0.089% fail on Drivers airbag
- 0.089% fail on Passengers airbag
-
3.7% fail on
Seat belts
-
3.7% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 2.0% fail on Body condition
-
1.6% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 1.6% fail on Chassis
-
0.18% fail on
Seats
- 0.18% fail on Passengers
-
0.089% fail on
Doors
- 0.089% fail on Passengers other
-
1.8% fail on
Steering
(61% better than other 1999 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Steering system
(65% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Track rod end (53% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Ball joint
- 0.089% fail on Steering rack
-
0.45% fail on
Power steering
- 0.27% fail on Operation
- 0.27% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.089% fail on Other components
-
1.3% fail on
Steering system
(65% better than other 1999 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.3% fail on Registration plate
-
0.18% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.18% fail on Attachment