Mazda 3 MOT Results
Registered in 200448.9% pass rate
from 1,780 tests in 2021
(11% worse than other 2004 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the Mazda 3 is unusually good or bad.
-
25% fail on
Suspension
(42% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
11% fail on
Suspension arms
(92% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 7.1% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Ball joint (58% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.17% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.056% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
9.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(67% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Linkage ball joints (100% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (100% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Ball joint dust cover (130% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.96% fail on Ball joint (98% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Linkage
- 0.17% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.056% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.056% fail on Pins and bushes
- 6.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (200% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Springs
(39% better than other 2004 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Coil springs
(39% better than other 2004 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Coil spring (39% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.056% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
2.6% fail on
Coil springs
(39% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.96% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.84% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.62% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.39% fail on Ball joint
- 0.17% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.056% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.056% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.45% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.22% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.22% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
0.28% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.22% fail on Pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.056% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.11% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.056% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.056% fail on Ball joint
-
11% fail on
Suspension arms
(92% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
20% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(20% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
8.9% fail on
Headlamps
(65% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 8.7% fail on Headlamp (71% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 7.9% fail on Stop lamp (81% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim (34% better than other 2004 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (160% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.6% fail on
Direction indicators
(41% better than other 2004 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Flashing type
(40% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.96% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.62% fail on Individual direction indicators (63% better than other 2004 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Flashing type
(40% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.73% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.73% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.73% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.73% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.67% fail on Rear reflectors (9 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.45% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.45% fail on Position lamp
-
0.22% fail on
Electrical equipment
(68% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.056% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.056% fail on Horn
-
0.11% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.11% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
8.9% fail on
Headlamps
(65% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
10% fail on
Brakes
(26% better than other 2004 cars)
-
5.9% fail on
Brake performance
(22% better than other 2004 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 4.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
1.5% fail on
Service brake performance
(51% better than other 2004 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
(51% better than other 2004 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Service brake performance (48% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.056% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.056% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
(51% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.56% fail on
Parking brake performance
(66% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.51% fail on
Rbt
(69% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Parking brake performance (65% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.056% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.056% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.51% fail on
Rbt
(69% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.51% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(55% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.51% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.39% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.17% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.51% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.34% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
4.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
3.8% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
3.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(71% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Brake pads (72% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.79% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.79% fail on Brake discs
-
0.056% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.056% fail on Cable
-
3.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(71% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.84% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.51% fail on Anti-lock braking system (60% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.51% fail on Flexible brake hoses
- 0.11% fail on Rigid brake pipes (97% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.056% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.056% fail on Pedal
-
0.056% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.056% fail on Lever
-
0.056% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.056% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.056% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.056% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
5.9% fail on
Brake performance
(22% better than other 2004 cars)
-
9.4% fail on
Tyres
(51% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 5.7% fail on Tread depth (59% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Condition (46% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Size/type
-
9.0% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
3.0% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.056% fail on
Sub-frame
- 0.056% fail on Sub-frame condition
- 1.8% fail on Exhaust system (44% better than other 2004 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Body
(3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.79% fail on Panel (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Other body component (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Transmission
(62% better than other 2004 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Drive shafts
(60% better than other 2004 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Joints (60% better than other 2004 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Drive shafts
(60% better than other 2004 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Chassis
(150% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Chassis condition (140% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.056% fail on Strengthening plate
- 0.51% fail on Bumpers (150% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.51% fail on
Doors
-
0.39% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.39% fail on Door condition
-
0.17% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.17% fail on Door condition
-
0.39% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.17% fail on
Cabs
- 0.17% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.11% fail on Floor
- 0.11% fail on Undertray
-
0.056% fail on
Towbar
- 0.056% fail on Towbar condition
-
0.056% fail on
Seats
- 0.056% fail on Driver's seat
-
3.0% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
8.9% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
8.7% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
8.2% fail on
Spark ignition
(36% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 7.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (120% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.90% fail on Catalyst emissions (66% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.79% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.22% fail on Non catalyst emissions (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.56% fail on
Compression ignition
(57% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.11% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (82% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.056% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
8.2% fail on
Spark ignition
(36% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.17% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
0.056% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.056% fail on Undertray
-
8.7% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
8.8% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(180% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 4.5% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Condition
- 0.17% fail on Requirements
- 4.0% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (160% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Airbags
- 0.17% fail on Drivers airbag
-
4.9% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Visibility
(31% better than other 2004 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Washers
- 2.5% fail on Wipers (40% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.17% fail on Windscreen
-
0.17% fail on
View to rear
- 0.17% fail on Mirrors
-
0.90% fail on
Steering
(80% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.73% fail on
Steering linkage components
(78% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.67% fail on Track rod end (77% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.056% fail on Ball joint
-
0.17% fail on
Power steering
- 0.056% fail on Operation
- 0.056% fail on Rams
- 0.056% fail on Other components
-
0.056% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.056% fail on Steering rack
-
0.73% fail on
Steering linkage components
(78% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.67% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.62% fail on Attachment
- 0.056% fail on Condition
-
0.45% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.45% fail on Registration plates
-
0.056% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.056% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mazda 3 (2004 - 2009)
Focus based. Bags of room and a comfortable ride, well equipped, saloon is the best looker and sharpest handling, depreciates slower than the 2004 Focus.