MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mazda » 2 » 2015

Mazda 2 MOT Results

Registered in 2015
80.0% pass rate
from 10,060 tests in 2021
(5.8% worse than other 2015 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 cars and highlighted areas where the Mazda 2 is unusually good or bad.

  • 7.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (19 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 7.6% fail on Seat belts (37 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 7.6% fail on Condition (40 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.040% fail on Pre-tensioners (35 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.020% fail on Attachment
    • 0.089% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 4.5% fail on Visibility (15% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Wipers (29% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.060% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.060% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.030% fail on View to rear
      • 0.030% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.0099% fail on Bonnet
  • 3.4% fail on Tyres (22% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.4% fail on Condition (36% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.050% fail on Size/type
  • 2.5% fail on Brakes (28% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Mechanical brake components (24% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.26% fail on Brake discs and drums (58% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Brake discs (58% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Brake performance (56% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Service brake performance (35% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.37% fail on Rbt (39% better than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.28% fail on Service brake performance (45% better than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.099% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.030% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.020% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.0099% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.15% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.15% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.14% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.0099% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.060% fail on Parking brake performance (63% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.060% fail on Rbt
          • 0.060% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.040% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (89% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.040% fail on Rbt (sp) (89% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.020% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.36% fail on Rigid brake pipes (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.070% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.060% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.050% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.0099% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.0099% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.0099% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.0099% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.0099% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 2.0% fail on Suspension (37% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.69% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.65% fail on Suspension arms (32% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint dust cover (110% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Pins and bushes (85% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Springs (70% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Coil springs (70% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.48% fail on Coil spring (71% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.0099% fail on Mounting
    • 0.19% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.060% fail on Linkage
      • 0.050% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.040% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.020% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.020% fail on Linkage ball joints (81% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.060% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.020% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.0099% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0099% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 1.8% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (60% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim (21% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.0099% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.27% fail on Stop lamp (70% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Headlamps (89% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp (89% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.0099% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.050% fail on Direction indicators (88% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Flashing type (88% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.030% fail on Individual direction indicators (74% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.020% fail on Side repeaters (93% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.050% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (91% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.040% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (84% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.040% fail on Rear fog lamp (84% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.040% fail on Rear fog lamp (83% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.040% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.030% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.0099% fail on Horn
    • 0.0099% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.0099% fail on Switch
    • 0.0099% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.0099% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 0.29% fail on Body, chassis, structure (69% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.099% fail on Exhaust system (69% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.080% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.080% fail on Tank (15 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.030% fail on Seats
      • 0.020% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.0099% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.020% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.020% fail on Transmission (95% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.020% fail on Drive shafts (94% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.020% fail on Joints (94% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.020% fail on Body
      • 0.020% fail on Other body component
    • 0.020% fail on Undertray
    • 0.0099% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.0099% fail on Other boot lid component
  • 0.19% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (84% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Exhaust emissions (86% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Spark ignition (83% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.050% fail on Catalyst emissions (78% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.050% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (88% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.0099% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.040% fail on Compression ignition (91% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.030% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (90% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.0099% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 0.030% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.030% fail on Undertray (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.0099% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.0099% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.080% fail on Steering (80% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.060% fail on Steering linkage components (82% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Track rod end (81% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.0099% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.0099% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.0099% fail on Steering column
  • 0.060% fail on Identification of the vehicle (73% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.060% fail on Registration plates (73% better than other 2015 cars)
  • 0.060% fail on Road Wheels (73% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.050% fail on Attachment (71% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.0099% fail on Condition
  • 0.020% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.0099% fail on Anchorages
    • 0.0099% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review

  • Mazda 2 (2015 on)
    Attractive small car that'll be cheap to run. Lots of standard equipment. Easy and fun to drive.
  • Mazda 2 (2007 - 2015)
    Enjoyable and fun to drive. Economical engines. Sensibly priced. Feels well built. Ride harshness over bumps improved for 2011.

    Search Good Garages