Maserati GranTurismo MOT Results

Registered in 2009
82.4% pass rate
from 205 tests in 2020
(52% better than other 2009 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Maserati GranTurismo is unusually good or bad.

  • 6.8% fail on Tyres (2.4% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Tread depth (12% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Condition (14% worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 4.9% fail on Brakes (43% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Brake performance (8.7% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (89% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (71% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.49% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 0.49% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.49% fail on Rbt
          • 0.49% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.49% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.49% fail on Rbt
          • 0.49% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 1.5% fail on Mechanical brake components (55% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Brake linings and pads (58% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.98% fail on Brake pads (58% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.49% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.49% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.49% fail on Pedal
    • 0.49% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.49% fail on Servos
    • 0.49% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.49% fail on Electronic parking brake
  • 3.4% fail on Suspension (74% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Springs (45% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Coil springs (44% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Coil spring (44% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.49% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.49% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.49% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.49% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 2.9% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (77% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.98% fail on Headlamps (70% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.49% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 0.98% fail on Headlamp aim (68% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Headlamp aim (65% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.98% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (59% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Rear fog lamp (60% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.49% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.49% fail on Switch
    • 0.49% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.49% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 2.4% fail on Visibility (57% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Wipers (29% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Washers
  • 2.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (50% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Exhaust emissions (47% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Spark ignition (17% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.98% fail on Catalyst emissions (17% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.98% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (8.0% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 1.5% fail on Steering (28% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Steering linkage components (9.9% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Track rod end (2.3% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.49% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.49% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.49% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.49% fail on Body
      • 0.49% fail on Other body component
  • 0.49% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.49% fail on Airbags
      • 0.49% fail on Drivers airbag
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages