MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » LTI » TX4 » 2010

LTI TX4 MOT Results

Registered in 2010
61.1% pass rate
from 1,864 tests in 2021
(9.2% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the LTI TX4 is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Suspension (30% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 9.7% fail on Suspension arms (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Ball joint (85% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Suspension arm (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Ball joint dust cover (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Other suspension component (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes (24 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Ball joint dust cover (13 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Other suspension component (18 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.86% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.59% fail on Linkage (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.27% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (17 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.11% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint dust cover (79% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Springs (69% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Coil springs (69% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Coil spring (70% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.054% fail on Mounting
    • 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers (75% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Suspension rods (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Pins and bushes (24 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.054% fail on Suspension rod
    • 0.43% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.32% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.32% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Axles
      • 0.11% fail on Axle (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (26% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim (44% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim (56% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.9% fail on Direction indicators (86% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Flashing type (86% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on Individual direction indicators (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.11% fail on All direction indicators
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.48% fail on Headlamp levelling device (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.7% fail on Stop lamp (41% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.97% fail on Electrical equipment (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Battery(ies) (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Horn
    • 0.86% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.86% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.86% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.16% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.16% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.16% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.11% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.11% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.054% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.054% fail on Outline marker lamp
  • 13% fail on Brakes (62% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.5% fail on Brake performance (87% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 6.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 6.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.32% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.054% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.054% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt
          • 0.97% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.27% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.054% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.054% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.11% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.80% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.59% fail on Cable (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Linkage (24 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.054% fail on Lever
        • 0.054% fail on Brake slack adjuster
      • 0.75% fail on Brake linings and pads (64% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.75% fail on Brake pads (64% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.75% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.8% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Pedal (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Hand lever
    • 1.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.054% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.38% fail on Hydraulic systems (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.054% fail on Servos
      • 0.054% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.054% fail on Valves
    • 0.32% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.32% fail on Lever
    • 0.32% fail on Flexible brake hoses (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.16% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.11% fail on Air and vacuum systems (13 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up (156 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 7.8% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Steering linkage components (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Track rod end (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Drag link end (27 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Intermediate drop arm (181 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Locking devices (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Other components (26 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Steering linkage (41 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Lock stop (191 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.80% fail on Power steering (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Pipes and hoses (20 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Operation (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Other components
      • 0.054% fail on Pump
    • 0.48% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.43% fail on Steering box (256 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.054% fail on Operation
    • 0.32% fail on Steering column (32 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Steering wheel (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Steering coupling (23 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Universal joint (29 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Steering play
      • 0.11% fail on Steering box (74 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 6.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (91% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Exhaust emissions (67% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.64% fail on Emissions not tested (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Spark ignition (45% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 1.5% fail on Fluid leaks (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Engine oil leaks (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Transmission oil leaks (14 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Other leaks (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 6.4% fail on Visibility
    • 4.1% fail on Washers (52% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Wipers
    • 0.27% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.16% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.16% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.054% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.054% fail on View to rear
      • 0.054% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 1.2% fail on Transmission
      • 1.2% fail on Prop shafts (16 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.80% fail on Prop shaft (64 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Joints (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Flexible couplings (33 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.054% fail on Bearing housing
    • 0.97% fail on Integral vehicle structure (17 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.97% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (24 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.59% fail on Seats (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Driver's seat (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Passenger's seat (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Doors (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Driver's door (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Door condition (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Front passenger's door (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Door condition
        • 0.054% fail on Hinge
    • 0.48% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.27% fail on Tank (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Pipe
      • 0.11% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.43% fail on Exhaust system (75% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Chassis (15 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Chassis condition (16 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.21% fail on Cabs (107 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Prescribed areas (107 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.054% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.16% fail on Engine mounting (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Bracket (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.054% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.054% fail on Body
      • 0.054% fail on Pillar
    • 0.054% fail on Floor
    • 0.054% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.054% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 4.3% fail on Tyres (28% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.4% fail on Condition (51% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 2.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Seat belts (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Prescribed areas (30 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Condition
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.054% fail on Requirements
    • 0.11% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.80% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.80% fail on Attachment (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.21% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.21% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.054% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.054% fail on Belt(s)/padding

Search Good Garages