LTI TX4 MOT Results

Registered in 2010
58.1% pass rate
from 2,384 tests in 2020
(25% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the LTI TX4 is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Suspension (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 13% fail on Suspension arms (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 8.8% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Suspension arm (13 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.084% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage ball joints (63% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Pins and bushes (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (33 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Linkage
      • 0.25% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.25% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (75% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Anti-roll bar (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.084% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.084% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Springs
      • 3.1% fail on Coil springs
        • 3.1% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.042% fail on Mounting
      • 0.042% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.042% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
    • 2.9% fail on Other suspension component (13 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint (13 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes (24 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Other suspension component (29 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Ball joint dust cover (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.55% fail on Suspension rods (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Pins and bushes (46 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.084% fail on Ball joint (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Suspension rod
    • 0.13% fail on Axles
      • 0.084% fail on Axle (15 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.042% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.042% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.042% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (39% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Direction indicators (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Flashing type (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.4% fail on Individual direction indicators (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.80% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.13% fail on All direction indicators
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim (32% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim (35% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.34% fail on Headlamp levelling device (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.2% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.042% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.6% fail on Electrical equipment (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Battery(ies) (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Horn (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Reversing lamps (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Reversing lamps (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.50% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.50% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.042% fail on Switch
    • 0.042% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.042% fail on Switch
    • 0.042% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 14% fail on Brakes (94% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Brake performance (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 5.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.0% fail on Parking brake performance (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.17% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.17% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (13 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.25% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.92% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.92% fail on Rbt (sp) (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.59% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.42% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.1% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Pedal (19 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Hand lever (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads (38% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Brake pads (39% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.042% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.67% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.67% fail on Cable (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.55% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.84% fail on Hydraulic systems (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Brake fluid (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.084% fail on Valves (17 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.25% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.25% fail on Lever
    • 0.21% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.21% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.13% fail on Air and vacuum systems (15 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Operation
      • 0.042% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
      • 0.042% fail on Servos
    • 0.084% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.084% fail on Other components (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 10% fail on Steering (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 9.0% fail on Steering linkage components (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 6.8% fail on Track rod end (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Drag link end (49 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Locking devices (71 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Intermediate drop arm (311 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Other components (58 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Steering component (93 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.084% fail on Steering linkage (33 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.71% fail on Steering gear (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Steering box (363 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Operation
    • 0.55% fail on Power steering (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Other components (15 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Pump (59 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.084% fail on Operation
      • 0.042% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.34% fail on Prescribed areas (187 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Steering wheel (16 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Steering play
      • 0.13% fail on Steering box (127 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.084% fail on Steering column (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.042% fail on Steering lock
  • 8.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Exhaust emissions (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Compression ignition (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.50% fail on Emissions not tested (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.084% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.084% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.76% fail on Spark ignition (49% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.76% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 2.9% fail on Fluid leaks (14 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Engine oil leaks (14 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Transmission oil leaks (37 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Other leaks (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks (22 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 6.7% fail on Visibility (35% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Washers (60% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Wipers
    • 0.21% fail on View to rear
      • 0.21% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.13% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.13% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.084% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.042% fail on Driver's view
  • 4.8% fail on Tyres (24% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.0% fail on Condition (64% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 4.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure (47% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Chassis (148 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Chassis condition (156 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.76% fail on Transmission
      • 0.76% fail on Prop shafts (13 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.63% fail on Prop shaft (110 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Flexible couplings (61 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.042% fail on Joints
    • 0.63% fail on Doors (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Driver's door (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.38% fail on Door condition (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.042% fail on Catch
      • 0.17% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.13% fail on Door condition
        • 0.042% fail on Catch
      • 0.042% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.042% fail on Catch
    • 0.38% fail on Integral vehicle structure (24 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (35 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.13% fail on Tank (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.084% fail on Pipe
      • 0.084% fail on System
      • 0.042% fail on Hose
      • 0.042% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.34% fail on Bumpers (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Exhaust system (78% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Engine mounting (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Engine mounting condition (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.084% fail on Bracket (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Seats
      • 0.13% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.042% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.13% fail on Cabs (167 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Prescribed areas (363 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.084% fail on Body
      • 0.042% fail on Body condition
      • 0.042% fail on Panel
    • 0.084% fail on Load security (26 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.084% fail on Access panel (84 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.042% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.042% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 1.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Seat belts (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas (58 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Condition
      • 0.042% fail on Attachment
    • 0.13% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.50% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.50% fail on Attachment
  • 0.46% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.46% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.042% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.042% fail on Anchorages

Search Good Garages