MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » LTI » TX4 » 2010

LTI TX4 MOT Results

Registered in 2010
61.7% pass rate
from 2,108 tests in 2017
(31% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the LTI TX4 is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Suspension (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 8.0% fail on Suspension arms (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 8.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Front suspension joints (18 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Coil springs
      • 3.1% fail on Condition
      • 0.095% fail on Location
    • 2.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (73% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.76% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Attachment (28 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.047% fail on Condition
    • 2.3% fail on Trailing arms (17 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (18 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Attachment
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Front (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Panhard rods (161 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (154 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Attachment
    • 0.33% fail on Sub-frames (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Attachment (20 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.095% fail on Condition (17 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.095% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.19% fail on Radius arms (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.095% fail on Prescribed areas (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.095% fail on Component mounting (21 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.047% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.047% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.047% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.047% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.047% fail on Axles
      • 0.047% fail on Axle beam
  • 20% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (46% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.2% fail on Registration plate lamp (98% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Position lamps (86% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Front lamps (99% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.81% fail on Rear lamps
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.6% fail on Direction indicators (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Flashing type (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Individual lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.71% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.47% fail on All direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.81% fail on Battery (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.71% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.66% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.19% fail on Switch (13 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.38% fail on Horn
    • 0.047% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.047% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.047% fail on Switch
  • 11% fail on Brakes (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Brake performance (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Rear wheels (74% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.047% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.047% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.047% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.0% fail on Hub components
      • 2.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.66% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.047% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.047% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.047% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 1.5% fail on Hydraulic systems (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Components (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.90% fail on Pipes (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Hoses
        • 0.047% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.28% fail on Operation (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.095% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.095% fail on Leaks
    • 1.4% fail on Service brake control components (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Pedal (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Anti-slip (16 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.095% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Parking brake (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.66% fail on ABS (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.57% fail on Mechanical components (17 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Cable (22 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.047% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.047% fail on Operation
  • 9.1% fail on Steering (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.8% fail on Steering system (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Track rod end (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Steering box (557 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Drag link end (84 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Steering arm (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Free play (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.095% fail on Steering box (283 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.095% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.19% fail on Other components (37 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Steering pivot point (57 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.095% fail on Intermediate drop arm (202 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Steering damper
    • 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas (627 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Power steering (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Other components (18 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.095% fail on Pipes and hoses (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Locking devices (37 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.095% fail on Steering control
      • 0.047% fail on Steering wheel
      • 0.047% fail on Steering column
    • 0.095% fail on Steering operation
  • 6.9% fail on Tyres
    • 5.8% fail on Tread depth (66% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Condition (62% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 4.9% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 2.7% fail on Washers (47% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Wipers
    • 0.57% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.14% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.14% fail on Mirrors
  • 2.3% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.95% fail on Doors (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Drivers (18 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Passengers front (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Vehicle structure (152 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Chassis (152 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Engine mountings (36 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Body condition (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.047% fail on Speedometer
  • 1.2% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.47% fail on Emissions not tested (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.28% fail on Tank (33 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Hose
      • 0.047% fail on System
    • 0.24% fail on Exhaust system (75% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Emissions
  • 0.76% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.76% fail on Seat belts (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Condition
      • 0.19% fail on Prescribed areas (34 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.095% fail on Attachment (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.33% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.33% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages