MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » LTI » TX1 » 2000

LTI TX1 MOT Results

Registered in 2000
56.8% pass rate
from 162 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the LTI TX1 is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Body, chassis, structure (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 13% fail on Integral vehicle structure (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 13% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.62% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 4.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.9% fail on Chassis
      • 1.9% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.9% fail on Floor (23 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Bumpers (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Body
      • 0.62% fail on Panel
      • 0.62% fail on Other body component
    • 1.2% fail on Cabs (9 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas (10 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.62% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.62% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.62% fail on Doors
      • 0.62% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.62% fail on Door condition
  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.2% fail on Side repeaters
    • 3.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 3.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 3.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.9% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.2% fail on Horn
      • 0.62% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 11% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 5.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 4.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 4.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 3.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.7% fail on Rbt
          • 3.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.62% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.62% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.62% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.62% fail on Rbt
          • 0.62% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 2.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.9% fail on Hydraulic systems (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Brake fluid (15 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.2% fail on Pedal
    • 0.62% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.62% fail on Lever
    • 0.62% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.62% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.62% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.62% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.62% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.62% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.62% fail on Brake discs
  • 12% fail on Suspension
    • 7.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.3% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 2.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 1.9% fail on Ball joint
    • 3.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.9% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.62% fail on Springs
      • 0.62% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.62% fail on Shackle bracket
    • 0.62% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.62% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.62% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.62% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 8.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 8.6% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 8.0% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Requirements
  • 7.4% fail on Visibility
    • 4.3% fail on Washers
    • 3.7% fail on Wipers
  • 6.2% fail on Steering
    • 4.3% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.1% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.62% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.62% fail on Drag link end
    • 1.2% fail on Power steering
      • 1.2% fail on Pump (48 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.62% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.62% fail on Steering box
  • 5.6% fail on Tyres
    • 4.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.2% fail on Condition
  • 4.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.7% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.1% fail on Compression ignition (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (12 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested (9 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.62% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 1.2% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.62% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.62% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks

Search Good Garages