LTI TX1 MOT Results

Registered in 1999
48.3% pass rate
from 331 tests in 2020
(16% worse than other 1999 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the LTI TX1 is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 6.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.60% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 6.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp levelling device (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.9% fail on Electrical equipment (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Horn (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Battery(ies) (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 3.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.3% fail on Position lamp
    • 3.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 3.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.30% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
  • 21% fail on Suspension
    • 8.5% fail on Suspension arms (69% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Pins and bushes (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.8% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.60% fail on Suspension arm
    • 6.3% fail on Springs (190% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.8% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.60% fail on Mounting (11 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Leaf springs (237 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.91% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (271 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.60% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts (361 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
        • 0.30% fail on Spring saddle
      • 1.8% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (12 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.1% fail on Other suspension component (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes (9 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.30% fail on Other suspension component
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.60% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.60% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.30% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.30% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.30% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.30% fail on Operation
  • 19% fail on Body, chassis, structure (71% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 11% fail on Integral vehicle structure (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 11% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.1% fail on Body (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Panel (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Body condition
      • 0.30% fail on Mounting fixings
      • 0.30% fail on Pillar
      • 0.30% fail on Other body component
    • 2.1% fail on Cabs (26 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Prescribed areas (28 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Chassis
      • 1.8% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.8% fail on Floor (12 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Bumpers (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.60% fail on Pipe
    • 0.60% fail on Doors
      • 0.30% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.30% fail on Door condition
      • 0.30% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.30% fail on Door condition
    • 0.60% fail on Seats
      • 0.30% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.30% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.30% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.30% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 18% fail on Brakes
    • 12% fail on Brake performance (53% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 7.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (92% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 7.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (100% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 4.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.7% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt
          • 2.1% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.30% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.30% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.30% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt
          • 0.91% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.91% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.30% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.5% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.30% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.30% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.30% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.30% fail on Cable
    • 1.2% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.91% fail on Pedal
      • 0.30% fail on Hand lever
    • 1.2% fail on Hydraulic systems (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.30% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.30% fail on Valves
    • 0.91% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.60% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.30% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.60% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.60% fail on Other components (29 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.30% fail on Servos
    • 0.30% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 16% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 10% fail on Steering linkage components (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Drag link end (13 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Intermediate drop arm (31 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Locking devices (10 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Steering gear (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Steering box (85 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Operation
    • 0.91% fail on Power steering
      • 0.60% fail on Operation
      • 0.60% fail on Other components
    • 0.91% fail on Steering play (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Steering box (39 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Steering column
  • 7.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (68% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 7.9% fail on Seat belts (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 7.3% fail on Prescribed areas (190% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Condition
      • 0.30% fail on Attachment
  • 7.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 6.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.3% fail on Compression ignition (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 3.0% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (19 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Emissions not tested (17 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.60% fail on Other leaks (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.30% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.30% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 5.4% fail on Visibility
    • 2.4% fail on Wipers
    • 2.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.60% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.60% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.30% fail on View to rear
      • 0.30% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.2% fail on Tyres
    • 3.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.91% fail on Condition
    • 0.30% fail on Size/type
  • 0.30% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.30% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.30% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.30% fail on Anchorages

Search Good Garages