MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » LTI » TX1 » 1999

LTI TX1 MOT Results

Registered in 1999
51.5% pass rate
from 604 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the LTI TX1 is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 7.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.8% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.5% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.17% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.17% fail on Switch
    • 4.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.6% fail on Horn (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.66% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.66% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale' (17 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Headlamp levelling device
        • 0.17% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 3.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Fog lamp (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Tell tale
    • 1.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.5% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.17% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.17% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.17% fail on Tell tales
    • 0.99% fail on Battery
    • 0.50% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.33% fail on Switch
      • 0.17% fail on Lamp
    • 0.17% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 19% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 13% fail on Body condition (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Vehicle structure (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Chassis (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.66% fail on Seats
      • 0.66% fail on Drivers (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on Doors
      • 0.33% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.17% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.17% fail on Body security
  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 5.6% fail on Front suspension joints (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 2.8% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 2.8% fail on Front (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Prescribed areas (54% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Spring mounting (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Component mounting (76% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 2.6% fail on Leaf springs (167 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes (238 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.99% fail on Shackle (197 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.50% fail on Anchor (322 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Other pins and bushes
      • 0.99% fail on Spring slippers (429 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Spring eye
      • 0.17% fail on Securing bolts
    • 2.6% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.6% fail on Condition
    • 1.7% fail on Coil springs
      • 1.5% fail on Condition
      • 0.17% fail on Location
    • 0.66% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.50% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.17% fail on Condition
    • 0.33% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices (9 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.17% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.17% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.17% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 9.9% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.5% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 3.6% fail on Front wheels
      • 3.6% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.5% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.66% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.33% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.8% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 5.0% fail on Components
        • 3.5% fail on Pipes
        • 1.3% fail on Hoses
        • 0.33% fail on Cylinders (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Servos (22 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Leaks
      • 0.17% fail on Operation
    • 1.7% fail on Service brake control components (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Pedal (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Anti-slip (12 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Hub components
      • 0.83% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.33% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.17% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.17% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 0.83% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.83% fail on Condition
    • 0.50% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.50% fail on Cable
    • 0.17% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.17% fail on Components
        • 0.17% fail on Servos
  • 13% fail on Steering (200% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 12% fail on Steering system (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 6.6% fail on Track rod end (190% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Steering box (99 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Drag link end (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Other components (25 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Steering pivot point (30 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.83% fail on Free play (9 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.83% fail on Steering box (57 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.50% fail on Steering arm (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.99% fail on Steering operation (10 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on Steering control (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Steering column (10 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.17% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.50% fail on Power steering
      • 0.50% fail on Other components
    • 0.50% fail on Prescribed areas (11 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Locking devices (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  • 9.8% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.1% fail on Washers
    • 3.6% fail on Wipers
    • 1.3% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.99% fail on Bonnet (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.9% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (46% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 7.9% fail on Seat belts (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 7.1% fail on Prescribed areas (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Condition
      • 0.33% fail on Requirements
      • 0.33% fail on Attachment (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  • 7.8% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (32% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Emissions (49% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Exhaust system (55% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Fuel system (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Pipe (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Tank
      • 0.17% fail on Cap
    • 0.50% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 5.1% fail on Tyres (37% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.7% fail on Condition (53% better than other 1999 cars)
  • 0.50% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.50% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.17% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.17% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages