Lotus Elan MOT Results
Registered in 199268.4% pass rate
from 190 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 cars and highlighted areas where the Lotus Elan is unusually good or bad.
-
17% fail on
Brakes
(57% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
15% fail on
Brake performance
(92% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
8.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(170% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 8.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (190% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
7.4% fail on
Service brake performance
(130% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
7.4% fail on
Rbt
(140% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 6.8% fail on Service brake performance (160% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
7.4% fail on
Rbt
(140% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
7.4% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(110% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
7.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(120% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Service brake performance (180% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
7.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(120% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Parking brake performance
(2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Rbt
(2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
3.7% fail on
Rbt
(2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
8.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(170% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 1.1% fail on Brake fluid (5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.1% fail on Brake pads
-
1.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.53% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 0.53% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.53% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.53% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
15% fail on
Brake performance
(92% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
11% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
5.8% fail on
Headlamps
- 5.8% fail on Headlamp
-
3.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 1.6% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.1% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.53% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.53% fail on Switch
-
1.1% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.1% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.1% fail on Horn
-
0.53% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.53% fail on Switch
-
5.8% fail on
Headlamps
-
10% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
10% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
10% fail on
Spark ignition
(88% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Non catalyst emissions (150% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.53% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.53% fail on Emissions not tested
-
10% fail on
Spark ignition
(88% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.53% fail on Other leaks
-
10% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
6.3% fail on
Visibility
- 4.2% fail on Washers
- 2.6% fail on Wipers
-
4.7% fail on
Suspension
- 2.1% fail on Wheel bearings
-
2.1% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.1% fail on Suspension arm (11 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.53% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.53% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
-
0.53% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.53% fail on Ball joint
-
1.1% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(88% better than other 1992 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.53% fail on
Transmission
-
0.53% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.53% fail on Joints
-
0.53% fail on
Drive shafts
-
1.1% fail on
Tyres
- 1.1% fail on Condition
-
0.53% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.53% fail on Registration plates