Lexus RX MOT Results
Registered in 201083.3% pass rate
from 2,258 tests in 2017
(43% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Lexus RX is unusually good or bad.
-
6.8% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(49% better than other 2010 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Position lamps
(50% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Rear lamps (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Front lamps
- 0.089% fail on All position lamps
- 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim (55% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Headlamps
(80% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Headlamp (88% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.13% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
-
0.044% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.044% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
- 0.27% fail on Stop lamp (89% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Direction indicators
(85% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Flashing type
(85% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.044% fail on Individual lamps
-
0.22% fail on
Flashing type
(85% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.13% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.089% fail on Trailer electrical socket (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.089% fail on Registration plate lamp (98% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.044% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.044% fail on Horn
-
4.4% fail on
Position lamps
(50% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
4.8% fail on
Tyres
(29% better than other 2010 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Condition
- 1.4% fail on Tread depth (61% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Valve stem (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.044% fail on Size/type
-
3.5% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(27% better than other 2010 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Wipers
- 0.62% fail on Washers (66% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Windscreen
- 0.089% fail on Mirrors
- 0.044% fail on Bonnet
-
3.3% fail on
Suspension
(60% better than other 2010 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Shock absorbers
(100% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Condition (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.35% fail on
Coil springs
(89% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Condition (89% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.35% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(78% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (79% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.089% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.22% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.22% fail on Front
-
0.13% fail on
Suspension arms
(90% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (89% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.044% fail on
Gas suspension
- 0.044% fail on Suspension unit
-
0.044% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.044% fail on Condition
- 0.044% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.044% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.044% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 0.044% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
0.044% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
2.2% fail on
Shock absorbers
(100% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Brakes
(70% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Hub components
(54% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Brake pads (48% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.044% fail on Brake discs
-
0.35% fail on
Brake performance
(84% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Front wheels (72% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.089% fail on Rear wheels (91% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.044% fail on Brake operation
- 0.044% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.089% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(84% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.089% fail on
Components
(79% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.044% fail on Pipes
- 0.044% fail on Hoses
-
0.089% fail on
Components
(79% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.044% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.044% fail on Condition
-
0.044% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
-
0.044% fail on
Components
- 0.044% fail on Valves
-
0.044% fail on
Components
- 0.044% fail on Restricted movement
-
1.3% fail on
Hub components
(54% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.35% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.35% fail on Registration plate
-
0.13% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(91% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.089% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.044% fail on Condition
- 0.044% fail on Attachment
-
0.089% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(84% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.089% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.089% fail on Condition
-
0.089% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.089% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 0.044% fail on Body condition
-
0.044% fail on
Doors
- 0.044% fail on Passengers other
-
0.044% fail on
Steering
-
0.044% fail on
Power steering
- 0.044% fail on Electronic power steering
-
0.044% fail on
Power steering
Read the Honest John Review
-
Lexus RX 450h (2009 - 2015)
Refined and cossetting. Strong performance from hybrid powerplant. Superbly engineered and well built. Low CO2 for a large 4x4 along with good fuel economy.