Lexus RX MOT Results
Registered in 201078.7% pass rate
from 2,555 tests in 2021
(52% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Lexus RX is unusually good or bad.
-
6.1% fail on
Suspension
(54% better than other 2010 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(39% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.78% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.078% fail on Linkage
- 0.078% fail on Linkage ball joints (93% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Ball joint
-
1.6% fail on
Springs
(70% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Coil springs
(70% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Coil spring (70% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Coil springs
(70% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Suspension arms
(72% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.078% fail on Ball joint dust cover (82% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 1.0% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.78% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.16% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.12% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.039% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.039% fail on Pins and bushes
-
2.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(39% better than other 2010 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Visibility
(30% better than other 2010 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Wipers
- 1.3% fail on Washers (50% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.078% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.078% fail on Windscreen
-
3.6% fail on
Tyres
(40% better than other 2010 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Condition
- 1.5% fail on Tread depth (56% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Size/type
-
3.2% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(73% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
(47% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim (44% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.82% fail on
Headlamps
(73% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.47% fail on Headlamp (83% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.59% fail on Stop lamp (80% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.078% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.039% fail on All position lamps
- 0.039% fail on Position lamp
-
0.078% fail on
Direction indicators
(96% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.078% fail on
Flashing type
(96% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Side repeaters (89% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.078% fail on
Flashing type
(96% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.078% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(86% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.078% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(86% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Rear fog lamp (86% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.078% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(86% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.078% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.039% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.039% fail on Horn
-
0.039% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.039% fail on Switch
- 0.039% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
(47% better than other 2010 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Brakes
(69% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(56% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(42% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Brake pads (41% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(86% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Brake discs (86% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(42% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Brake performance
(74% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.70% fail on
Service brake performance
(65% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.70% fail on
Rbt
(64% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Service brake performance (63% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.70% fail on
Rbt
(64% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(65% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.12% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.078% fail on Service brake imbalance (82% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.12% fail on
Parking brake performance
(85% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Rbt
(85% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Parking brake performance (88% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.12% fail on
Rbt
(85% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(93% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Rbt (sp) (93% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.70% fail on
Service brake performance
(65% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.12% fail on Lever
-
0.039% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.039% fail on Hand lever
- 0.039% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 0.039% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.039% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.039% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
1.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(56% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.47% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.47% fail on Registration plates
-
0.47% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(88% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Transmission
(88% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Drive shafts
(87% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Joints (87% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Drive shafts
(87% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Bumpers
- 0.078% fail on Exhaust system (95% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.039% fail on
Body
- 0.039% fail on Other body component
-
0.039% fail on
Doors
-
0.039% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.039% fail on Door condition
-
0.039% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
0.20% fail on
Transmission
(88% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(93% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(93% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Spark ignition
(89% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (76% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Spark ignition
(89% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(93% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Steering
(93% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Steering linkage components
(94% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Ball joint
- 0.039% fail on Track rod end
- 0.039% fail on Locking devices
-
0.039% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.039% fail on Steering rack
-
0.12% fail on
Steering linkage components
(94% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.078% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(91% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.039% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.039% fail on Condition
- 0.039% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.039% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.078% fail on
Road Wheels
(83% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Lexus RX 450h (2009 - 2015)
Refined and cossetting. Strong performance from hybrid powerplant. Superbly engineered and well built. Low CO2 for a large 4x4 along with good fuel economy.