Lexus RX MOT Results

Registered in 2010
79.2% pass rate
from 2,625 tests in 2020
(44% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Lexus RX is unusually good or bad.

  • 6.2% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (52% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Position lamps (75% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Position lamp (68% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on All position lamps (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim (48% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim (44% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.65% fail on Headlamps (78% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Headlamp (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.38% fail on Stop lamp (87% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Direction indicators (90% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Flashing type (90% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.076% fail on Individual direction indicators (93% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.076% fail on Side repeaters (88% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.038% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.19% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.19% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.19% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.076% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.076% fail on Switch
    • 0.038% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.038% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 4.4% fail on Suspension (60% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.88% fail on Suspension arms (72% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Pins and bushes (61% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Ball joint (84% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.84% fail on Springs (78% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Coil springs (78% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.84% fail on Coil spring (78% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.72% fail on Anti-roll bars (75% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (50% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint dust cover (75% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.076% fail on Linkage ball joints (92% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Linkage
    • 0.27% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.15% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.11% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.038% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.076% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.076% fail on Suspension unit (14 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.038% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.038% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 4.4% fail on Tyres (31% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Condition
    • 1.5% fail on Tread depth (59% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.038% fail on Size/type
  • 3.7% fail on Visibility (25% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Wipers
    • 0.95% fail on Washers (59% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.11% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.076% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.038% fail on View to rear
      • 0.038% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.2% fail on Brakes (55% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Mechanical brake components (33% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.50% fail on Brake discs and drums (51% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.50% fail on Brake discs (51% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.91% fail on Brake performance (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Service brake performance (59% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.65% fail on Rbt (61% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.57% fail on Service brake performance (58% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.076% fail on Service brake imbalance (79% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.038% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.038% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.15% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.11% fail on Rbt (sp) (73% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.038% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.15% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (89% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.038% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.038% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.038% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.038% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 0.11% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.076% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.038% fail on Pedal
    • 0.076% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.076% fail on Lever
    • 0.076% fail on Rigid brake pipes (85% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.76% fail on Identification of the vehicle (82% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.76% fail on Registration plates (83% worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.38% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (87% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Exhaust emissions (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Spark ignition (74% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.38% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.27% fail on Body, chassis, structure (92% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Transmission (90% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Drive shafts (90% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.076% fail on Joints (93% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.038% fail on Drive shaft
    • 0.076% fail on Exhaust system (94% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.038% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.038% fail on Body
      • 0.038% fail on Body condition
  • 0.19% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.19% fail on Attachment
  • 0.15% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (79% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.15% fail on Condition
  • 0.11% fail on Steering (94% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.076% fail on Steering linkage components (95% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.038% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.038% fail on Steering wheel
Read the Honest John Review

  • Lexus RX 450h (2009 - 2015)
    Refined and cossetting. Strong performance from hybrid powerplant. Superbly engineered and well built. Low CO2 for a large 4x4 along with good fuel economy.

    Search Good Garages