Lexus RX MOT Results
Registered in 200262.0% pass rate
from 397 tests in 2021
(19% better than other 2002 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Lexus RX is unusually good or bad.
-
14% fail on
Brakes
-
7.3% fail on
Brake performance
-
5.8% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 2.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 2.3% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (10 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Gradient tester (sp) (51 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
-
2.0% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.8% fail on
Rbt
- 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.25% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.25% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.25% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
1.8% fail on
Rbt
-
1.5% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt
- 1.0% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.25% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.25% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.25% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt
- 0.25% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
5.8% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
4.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
3.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 3.3% fail on Brake pads
-
1.0% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.0% fail on Brake discs
-
0.25% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.25% fail on Cable
-
3.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
2.5% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 2.0% fail on Electronic stability control (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.76% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.50% fail on Hand lever
- 0.25% fail on Pedal
-
0.50% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.50% fail on Lever
-
0.50% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.50% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.25% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.25% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.25% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
7.3% fail on
Brake performance
-
13% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(80% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
12% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(84% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
12% fail on
Spark ignition
(110% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 6.5% fail on Catalyst emissions (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.25% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
12% fail on
Spark ignition
(110% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.50% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.50% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
12% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(84% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
9.8% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(41% better than other 2002 cars)
-
4.8% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.8% fail on Headlamp
- 2.0% fail on Stop lamp (59% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
(68% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Headlamp aim (72% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 1.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.50% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.50% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.50% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.50% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.50% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.50% fail on Battery(ies)
-
0.25% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.25% fail on Switch
-
0.25% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.25% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.25% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.25% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.25% fail on Rear reflectors
-
4.8% fail on
Headlamps
-
9.6% fail on
Suspension
(43% better than other 2002 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.0% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 2.0% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.76% fail on Ball joint
- 0.76% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 2.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
2.0% fail on
Suspension arms
(63% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.76% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.25% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.25% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.50% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.50% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.50% fail on Sub-frame
-
0.25% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.25% fail on Macpherson strut
-
5.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
5.3% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(47% better than other 2002 cars)
- 5.0% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.25% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.25% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
4.5% fail on
Visibility
(44% better than other 2002 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Wipers
- 0.50% fail on Washers (86% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Bonnet
-
0.25% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.25% fail on Windscreen
-
3.0% fail on
Tyres
- 2.0% fail on Condition
- 1.3% fail on Tread depth
-
2.0% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 1.8% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.25% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.25% fail on Condition
-
1.8% fail on
Steering
-
1.0% fail on
Power steering
- 0.76% fail on Pipes and hoses (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Operation
-
0.50% fail on
Steering linkage components
(83% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Track rod end (80% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.25% fail on Steering rack
-
1.0% fail on
Power steering
-
0.76% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.76% fail on Registration plates
-
0.76% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.76% fail on Attachment