MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Lexus » LS » 2000

Lexus LS MOT Results

Registered in 2000
74.0% pass rate
from 208 tests in 2017
(47% better than other 2000 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Lexus LS is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (34% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.3% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.48% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.48% fail on Rear lamps
    • 4.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.96% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest (15 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.96% fail on Headlamp levelling device (32 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.48% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 2.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.96% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.96% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.96% fail on Individual lamps
    • 0.48% fail on Battery
    • 0.48% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.48% fail on Fog lamp
  • 8.7% fail on Suspension (60% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.9% fail on Coil springs
      • 1.9% fail on Condition
    • 1.9% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.96% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.96% fail on Front
    • 0.48% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.48% fail on Condition
    • 0.48% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.48% fail on Component mounting
  • 7.2% fail on Brakes (58% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 3.4% fail on Components
        • 3.4% fail on Pipes
      • 0.96% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Brake performance (68% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 1.4% fail on Hub components
      • 0.96% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.96% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.96% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.96% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.96% fail on Condition
  • 4.3% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (60% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.9% fail on Emissions
    • 0.48% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 3.4% fail on Tyres (61% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Condition
    • 1.4% fail on Tread depth
  • 1.9% fail on Driver's view of the road (80% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Wipers (74% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.96% fail on Washers
  • 1.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 1.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.96% fail on Condition
      • 0.48% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.96% fail on Steering (79% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.96% fail on Steering system
      • 0.48% fail on Free play
        • 0.48% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.48% fail on Ball joint
  • 0.48% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.48% fail on Body condition
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages