Lexus LS MOT Results

Registered in 1995
68.7% pass rate
from 182 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Lexus LS is unusually good or bad.

  • 13% fail on Suspension
    • 6.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.2% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 2.2% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.55% fail on Suspension arm
    • 4.9% fail on Springs (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Coil springs (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 4.9% fail on Coil spring (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.6% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.55% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.55% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.55% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.55% fail on Ball joint
  • 8.8% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (44% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.1% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.1% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.1% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.55% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
  • 7.1% fail on Brakes
    • 5.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 3.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 2.2% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt
          • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 1.1% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.55% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.1% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.1% fail on Brake fluid
    • 1.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.55% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.55% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.55% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.55% fail on Brake pads
  • 4.9% fail on Visibility
    • 3.8% fail on Wipers
    • 1.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.55% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.55% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.55% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.55% fail on Windscreen
  • 4.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.4% fail on Spark ignition
        • 3.8% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.55% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.55% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.55% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 3.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure (65% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.55% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.55% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.55% fail on Chassis
      • 0.55% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.55% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.55% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
  • 3.3% fail on Tyres
    • 2.2% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Tread depth
  • 1.6% fail on Steering
    • 1.1% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.1% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.55% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.55% fail on Track rod end
  • 1.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
      • 0.55% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.55% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.55% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages