MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Lexus » IS » 2009

Lexus IS MOT Results

Registered in 2009
75.5% pass rate
from 2,860 tests in 2021
(41% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Lexus IS is unusually good or bad.

  • 7.5% fail on Brakes
    • 2.8% fail on Brake performance (40% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.49% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.035% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.035% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.73% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (64% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.73% fail on Rbt (sp) (63% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Parking brake performance (54% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.42% fail on Rbt (52% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.42% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.24% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (60% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.21% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.10% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.17% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.63% fail on Brake discs and drums (46% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.63% fail on Brake discs (45% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Electronic stability control (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.91% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.28% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.28% fail on Pedal
    • 0.21% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.21% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.17% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.17% fail on Lever
    • 0.10% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.035% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.035% fail on Valves
    • 0.035% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.035% fail on Other components
  • 6.3% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (50% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.070% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.035% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.52% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.35% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.17% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.14% fail on Horn
      • 0.035% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.24% fail on Direction indicators (88% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Flashing type (88% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Individual direction indicators (88% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.070% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.035% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.21% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.10% fail on Stop lamp (97% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.070% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (89% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Rear fog lamp (89% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.070% fail on Rear fog lamp (89% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.035% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.035% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.035% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
  • 5.3% fail on Tyres
    • 3.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.21% fail on Size/type
  • 4.7% fail on Visibility (20% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Wipers (38% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.80% fail on Washers (74% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.10% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.035% fail on Window
    • 0.035% fail on Bonnet
  • 2.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (41% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Exhaust emissions (38% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Spark ignition (51% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.70% fail on Catalyst emissions (48% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.70% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.035% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.035% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 1.3% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.63% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.42% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.14% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.10% fail on Emission control equipment (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.035% fail on Catalytic converter
          • 0.035% fail on Particulate filter
          • 0.035% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.035% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
    • 0.035% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.035% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 1.7% fail on Suspension (88% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.84% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.31% fail on Springs (95% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Coil springs (94% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.31% fail on Coil spring (94% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Wheel bearings (60% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Suspension arms (97% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Pins and bushes (96% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Ball joint (97% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Anti-roll bars (97% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.035% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.035% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.035% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.035% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 0.66% fail on Body, chassis, structure (86% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Exhaust system (86% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.070% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.070% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.070% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.035% fail on Hose
      • 0.035% fail on Pipe
    • 0.070% fail on Body
      • 0.070% fail on Other body component
    • 0.035% fail on Doors
      • 0.035% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.035% fail on Door condition
    • 0.035% fail on Seats
      • 0.035% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.035% fail on Undertray
  • 0.59% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.59% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.45% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.42% fail on Attachment
    • 0.035% fail on Condition
  • 0.28% fail on Steering (88% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Steering linkage components (87% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Track rod end (88% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.035% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.035% fail on Operation
    • 0.035% fail on Power steering
      • 0.035% fail on Other components
  • 0.24% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (77% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (64% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.035% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.035% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

  • Lexus IS 250C (2009 - 2013)
    Incredibly refined. Barely any top-down turbulence. Metal-folding roof retracts smoothly. Effortless performance.
  • Lexus IS (2005 - 2013)
    Very well built. Top quality interior. Lexus dealers are best in the business. Impressive refinement. All engines chain cam. IS250 probably the most reliable car you can buy.

    Search Good Garages