Lexus IS MOT Results
Registered in 200059.7% pass rate
from 790 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Lexus IS is unusually good or bad.
-
15% fail on
Suspension
- 4.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
4.7% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.2% fail on Ball joint
- 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.63% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.51% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.13% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
3.4% fail on
Springs
-
3.4% fail on
Coil springs
- 3.4% fail on Coil spring
- 0.13% fail on Mounting
-
3.4% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.5% fail on Shock absorbers (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.89% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.63% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.25% fail on Sub-frame
-
0.63% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.51% fail on Ball joint
- 0.13% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.51% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(86% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Linkage
- 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.13% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
-
0.13% fail on
Axles
- 0.13% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
-
0.13% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.13% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
11% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(26% better than other 2000 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.1% fail on Headlamp
-
2.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.25% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 2.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 1.4% fail on Stop lamp (65% better than other 2000 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.63% fail on Horn
- 0.51% fail on Battery(ies)
-
1.0% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.0% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.63% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.25% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.13% fail on All direction indicators
-
1.0% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.38% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.38% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.38% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.38% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.25% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.25% fail on Position lamp
-
0.13% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.13% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
4.1% fail on
Headlamps
-
11% fail on
Brakes
-
5.9% fail on
Brake performance
-
4.7% fail on
Service brake performance
(56% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Rbt
(57% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Service brake performance (60% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.89% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.13% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
-
4.6% fail on
Rbt
(57% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.89% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(74% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.89% fail on Rbt (sp) (72% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.63% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.63% fail on
Rbt
- 0.51% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.13% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.63% fail on
Rbt
-
0.51% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(78% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.51% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(78% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.51% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(78% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
4.7% fail on
Service brake performance
(56% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.0% fail on Brake pads
-
0.76% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.76% fail on Brake discs
-
2.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.0% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.89% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.13% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.76% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.76% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.63% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.63% fail on Lever
- 0.63% fail on Rigid brake pipes (80% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.25% fail on Reservoirs (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Valves
- 0.38% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.25% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.13% fail on Pedal
- 0.13% fail on Hand lever
-
0.13% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.13% fail on Other components
-
5.9% fail on
Brake performance
-
7.0% fail on
Tyres
(46% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Condition (78% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Tread depth
- 0.13% fail on Size/type
-
6.1% fail on
Visibility
- 3.5% fail on Wipers
- 2.8% fail on Washers
- 0.13% fail on Bonnet
-
0.13% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.13% fail on Windscreen
-
0.13% fail on
View to rear
- 0.13% fail on Mirrors
-
6.1% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(37% better than other 2000 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.2% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 2.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.63% fail on
Chassis
- 0.63% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.38% fail on Bumpers
-
0.25% fail on
Body
- 0.13% fail on Panel
- 0.13% fail on Other body component
- 0.25% fail on Undertray (9 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.13% fail on Bracket
-
0.13% fail on
Seats
- 0.13% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.13% fail on
Cabs
- 0.13% fail on Prescribed areas
-
5.6% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(35% better than other 2000 cars)
-
5.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(32% better than other 2000 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Spark ignition
- 3.3% fail on Catalyst emissions (39% better than other 2000 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 1.0% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.13% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested
-
5.4% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.13% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.13% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
5.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(32% better than other 2000 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(51% better than other 2000 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.51% fail on Condition
- 0.13% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.8% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.6% fail on
Steering
(57% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.89% fail on
Steering linkage components
(63% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Track rod end (74% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Ball joint
- 0.13% fail on Drag link end
- 0.13% fail on Locking devices
-
0.38% fail on
Power steering
- 0.25% fail on Operation
- 0.13% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
0.25% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.25% fail on Steering rack
-
0.13% fail on
Steering play
- 0.13% fail on Steering rack
-
0.89% fail on
Steering linkage components
(63% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.76% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.76% fail on Registration plates
-
0.25% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.25% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Lexus IS (1999 - 2005)
Well equipped, reliable and rated highly by owners. Controlled rear-drive handling, rewarding manual gearshift and decent ride.