Lexus IS MOT Results
Registered in 199964.5% pass rate
from 470 tests in 2021
(15% better than other 1999 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Lexus IS is unusually good or bad.
-
15% fail on
Suspension
- 5.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
4.3% fail on
Springs
-
4.3% fail on
Coil springs
(90% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Coil spring (93% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Coil springs
(90% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.7% fail on Ball joint
- 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.43% fail on Suspension arm
- 1.7% fail on Shock absorbers (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.64% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(81% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.21% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.21% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.64% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.64% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.21% fail on Sub-frame
-
0.43% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.21% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.21% fail on Ball joint
-
0.21% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.21% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
10% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
3.4% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.4% fail on Headlamp
-
2.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.21% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 1.9% fail on Stop lamp
- 1.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.1% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.64% fail on Horn
- 0.43% fail on Battery(ies)
-
0.64% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.64% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.64% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.64% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.43% fail on
Direction indicators
(81% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Flashing type
(81% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.43% fail on
Flashing type
(81% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.21% fail on Main beam tell-tale
- 0.21% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
0.21% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.21% fail on Switch
-
3.4% fail on
Headlamps
-
9.1% fail on
Brakes
-
4.3% fail on
Brake performance
(42% better than other 1999 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.0% fail on
Rbt
- 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.43% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
3.0% fail on
Rbt
-
1.1% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(68% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (66% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.64% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.64% fail on
Rbt
- 0.43% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.21% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.64% fail on
Rbt
-
0.43% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(83% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.21% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.21% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.21% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
3.0% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.9% fail on Brake pads
-
0.64% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.43% fail on Brake discs
- 0.21% fail on Brake drums
-
0.43% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.43% fail on Cable
-
1.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.5% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 1.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.85% fail on Electronic stability control
- 1.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes (65% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.43% fail on Lever
-
0.21% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.21% fail on Hand lever
- 0.21% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.21% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.21% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
4.3% fail on
Brake performance
(42% better than other 1999 cars)
-
6.6% fail on
Tyres
- 3.6% fail on Condition
- 3.0% fail on Tread depth
-
6.0% fail on
Visibility
- 3.2% fail on Washers
- 2.8% fail on Wipers
-
0.21% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.21% fail on Windscreen
-
5.1% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(47% better than other 1999 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 0.21% fail on Strengthening plate
- 1.7% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.85% fail on
Chassis
- 0.85% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.43% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.21% fail on Pipe
- 0.21% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.43% fail on Undertray (20 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Bumpers
-
0.21% fail on
Body
- 0.21% fail on Panel
-
1.7% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
-
4.7% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(43% better than other 1999 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(43% better than other 1999 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Spark ignition
- 2.6% fail on Catalyst emissions (56% better than other 1999 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Emissions not tested
-
4.5% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.21% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.21% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
4.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(43% better than other 1999 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
1.5% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.21% fail on Attachment
-
0.43% fail on
Airbags
- 0.43% fail on Drivers airbag (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.43% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.5% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.9% fail on
Steering
-
1.5% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.3% fail on Track rod end
- 0.21% fail on Locking devices
-
0.43% fail on
Power steering
- 0.21% fail on Operation
- 0.21% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
1.5% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.85% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.85% fail on Registration plates
-
0.64% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.43% fail on Attachment
- 0.21% fail on Hubs
Read the Honest John Review
-
Lexus IS (1999 - 2005)
Well equipped, reliable and rated highly by owners. Controlled rear-drive handling, rewarding manual gearshift and decent ride.