MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Lexus » CT 200h » 2016

Lexus CT 200h MOT Results

Registered in 2016
87.4% pass rate
from 2,991 tests in 2021
(26% better than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Lexus CT 200h is unusually good or bad.

  • 4.9% fail on Visibility (24% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Wipers (62% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Washers (67% better than other 2016 cars)
  • 2.8% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamps (110% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.94% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.90% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.033% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.17% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.17% fail on Horn (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.10% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.067% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.033% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.067% fail on Stop lamp (89% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.067% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.067% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.067% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.067% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.067% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.067% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (81% better than other 2016 cars)
  • 2.8% fail on Tyres (29% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Condition
    • 1.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.033% fail on Size/type
  • 1.3% fail on Brakes (52% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.64% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.43% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.40% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.033% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.10% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.10% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.10% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.067% fail on Service brake performance (84% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.067% fail on Rbt (83% better than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.033% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.033% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.067% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.067% fail on Rbt
          • 0.033% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.033% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.033% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.47% fail on Mechanical brake components (76% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Brake linings and pads (75% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.40% fail on Brake pads (75% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.067% fail on Brake discs and drums (86% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.067% fail on Brake discs (86% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.033% fail on Lever
    • 0.27% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.27% fail on Lever (180% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.033% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.033% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.033% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.033% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.033% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.033% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.033% fail on Electronic stability control
  • 0.37% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.20% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.067% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.067% fail on Tank (24 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.067% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.033% fail on Transmission
      • 0.033% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.033% fail on Joints
    • 0.033% fail on Undertray
  • 0.20% fail on Suspension (90% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.033% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.033% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.033% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.033% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
  • 0.13% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.10% fail on Attachment
    • 0.033% fail on Condition
  • 0.10% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.10% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.10% fail on Condition
  • 0.067% fail on Steering
    • 0.033% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.033% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.033% fail on Steering column
  • 0.067% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (92% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.033% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.033% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.033% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.033% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.033% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.033% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.033% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review

  • Lexus CT 200h (2011 - 2020)
    Upmarket hatchback powered by the same hybrid system as the Toyota Prius. Exceptional front seat legroom. High-quality interior.

    Search Good Garages