Lexus CT 200h MOT Results
Registered in 201588.0% pass rate
from 3,544 tests in 2021
(39% better than other 2015 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 cars and highlighted areas where the Lexus CT 200h is unusually good or bad.
-
3.4% fail on
Visibility
- 2.9% fail on Wipers
- 0.42% fail on Washers (69% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.028% fail on Bonnet
-
0.028% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.028% fail on Windscreen
-
3.4% fail on
Tyres
(22% better than other 2015 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Condition
- 1.6% fail on Tread depth (29% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.085% fail on Size/type
-
3.2% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(29% better than other 2015 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.3% fail on Headlamp
-
1.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.085% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.48% fail on
Reversing lamps
(5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Reversing lamps (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.028% fail on Reversing lamp switch
- 0.17% fail on Stop lamp (81% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.17% fail on Horn
-
0.085% fail on
Direction indicators
(80% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.085% fail on
Flashing type
(80% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.056% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.028% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.085% fail on
Flashing type
(80% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.056% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.056% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.056% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.056% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.028% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.3% fail on
Headlamps
-
1.5% fail on
Brakes
(57% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.79% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(65% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.68% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(62% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Brake pads (62% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(58% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Brake discs (58% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.68% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(62% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.62% fail on
Brake performance
(43% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.40% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.40% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.25% fail on
Service brake performance
(59% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Rbt
(58% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Service brake performance (61% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.056% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.028% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.25% fail on
Rbt
(58% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.17% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.085% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.085% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.17% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.028% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.028% fail on
Rbt
- 0.028% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.028% fail on
Rbt
-
0.40% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
0.20% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.14% fail on Pedal
- 0.056% fail on Hand lever
-
0.085% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.085% fail on Lever
-
0.085% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.085% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.028% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.028% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.028% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.028% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.79% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(65% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(64% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Bumpers (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.085% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.085% fail on Tank (16 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.028% fail on
Transmission
-
0.028% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.028% fail on Joints
-
0.028% fail on
Prop shafts
-
0.028% fail on
Body
- 0.028% fail on Other body component
-
0.028% fail on
Doors
-
0.028% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.028% fail on Door condition
-
0.028% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.028% fail on
Seats
- 0.028% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.28% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.28% fail on Registration plates
-
0.17% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.17% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.14% fail on Condition
- 0.028% fail on Requirements
-
0.17% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.11% fail on
Steering
(72% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.056% fail on Drag link end (12 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.056% fail on Track rod end (82% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.028% fail on Steering arm
-
0.11% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.11% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.11% fail on Attachment
-
0.028% fail on
Suspension
-
0.028% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.028% fail on Suspension arm
-
0.028% fail on
Suspension arms
-
0.028% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
0.028% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.028% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.028% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.028% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.028% fail on
Exhaust emissions
Read the Honest John Review
-
Lexus CT 200h (2011 - 2020)
Upmarket hatchback powered by the same hybrid system as the Toyota Prius. Exceptional front seat legroom. High-quality interior.