Lexus CT 200h MOT Results

Registered in 2012
82.1% pass rate
from 4,295 tests in 2021
(42% better than other 2012 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 cars and highlighted areas where the Lexus CT 200h is unusually good or bad.

  • 7.3% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (21% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamps (49% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp (59% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (77% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim (33% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim (40% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.49% fail on Electrical equipment (120% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.14% fail on Direction indicators (92% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Flashing type (92% better than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.070% fail on Individual direction indicators (93% better than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.070% fail on Side repeaters (89% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.070% fail on Stop lamp (97% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.070% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (82% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Rear fog lamp (82% better than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.070% fail on Rear fog lamp (82% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.023% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.023% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.023% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 3.8% fail on Tyres (31% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.6% fail on Tread depth (46% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.070% fail on Size/type
  • 3.7% fail on Brakes (38% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Mechanical brake components (43% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads (31% better than other 2012 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Brake pads (32% better than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.023% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.42% fail on Brake discs and drums (57% better than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.42% fail on Brake discs (57% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.023% fail on Brake slack adjuster
    • 1.6% fail on Brake performance (41% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.95% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.51% fail on Service brake performance (63% better than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.49% fail on Rbt (64% better than other 2012 cars)
          • 0.37% fail on Service brake performance (68% better than other 2012 cars)
          • 0.093% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.023% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.023% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.023% fail on Service brake performance (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.42% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.40% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.30% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.14% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.023% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.023% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.12% fail on Parking brake performance (75% better than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Rbt (74% better than other 2012 cars)
          • 0.093% fail on Parking brake performance (76% better than other 2012 cars)
          • 0.023% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
    • 0.42% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.42% fail on Lever (110% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.19% fail on Pedal
      • 0.19% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.21% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.047% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.047% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.047% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (86% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Anti-lock braking system (80% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.023% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.023% fail on Servos
  • 3.7% fail on Visibility
    • 3.1% fail on Wipers (34% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.72% fail on Washers (66% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.070% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.070% fail on Windscreen
  • 0.75% fail on Suspension (92% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Anti-roll bars (81% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (61% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.093% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.070% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.023% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.23% fail on Suspension arms (92% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes (87% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Ball joint (97% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.093% fail on Shock absorbers (82% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.070% fail on Wheel bearings (80% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.023% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.023% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.023% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.023% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 0.72% fail on Body, chassis, structure (71% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Exhaust system (58% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.093% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.093% fail on Tank (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.070% fail on Seats
      • 0.070% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.047% fail on Body
      • 0.047% fail on Other body component
    • 0.047% fail on Doors
      • 0.023% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.023% fail on Hinge
      • 0.023% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.023% fail on Door condition
    • 0.023% fail on Undertray
  • 0.49% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.49% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.23% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.23% fail on Attachment
  • 0.14% fail on Steering (91% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.070% fail on Steering play
      • 0.070% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.023% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.023% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.023% fail on Steering column
    • 0.023% fail on Steering shaft
  • 0.14% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (93% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Exhaust emissions (93% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Spark ignition (91% better than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (82% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.023% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.12% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (82% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.070% fail on Seat belts (74% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Condition (81% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Requirements
    • 0.047% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (88% better than other 2012 cars)
Read the Honest John Review

  • Lexus CT 200h (2011 - 2020)
    Upmarket hatchback powered by the same hybrid system as the Toyota Prius. Exceptional front seat legroom. High-quality interior.

    Search Good Garages