Lexus CT 200h MOT Results
Registered in 201282.1% pass rate
from 4,295 tests in 2021
(42% better than other 2012 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 cars and highlighted areas where the Lexus CT 200h is unusually good or bad.
-
7.3% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(21% better than other 2012 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Headlamps
(49% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Headlamp (59% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (77% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
(33% better than other 2012 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim (40% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.49% fail on
Electrical equipment
(120% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.47% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.023% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.14% fail on
Direction indicators
(92% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Flashing type
(92% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.070% fail on Individual direction indicators (93% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.070% fail on Side repeaters (89% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Flashing type
(92% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.070% fail on Stop lamp (97% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.070% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(82% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.070% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(82% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.070% fail on Rear fog lamp (82% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.070% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(82% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.023% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.023% fail on Reversing lamps
- 0.023% fail on Rear reflectors
-
3.5% fail on
Headlamps
(49% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Tyres
(31% better than other 2012 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Condition
- 1.6% fail on Tread depth (46% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.070% fail on Size/type
-
3.7% fail on
Brakes
(38% better than other 2012 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(43% better than other 2012 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(31% better than other 2012 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Brake pads (32% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.023% fail on Brake linings
-
0.42% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(57% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Brake discs (57% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.023% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.023% fail on Brake slack adjuster
-
1.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(31% better than other 2012 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Brake performance
(41% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.95% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.95% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.51% fail on
Service brake performance
(63% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Rbt
(64% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Service brake performance (68% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.093% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.023% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.023% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.023% fail on Service brake performance (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.49% fail on
Rbt
(64% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.42% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.40% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.30% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.14% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.023% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.023% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.40% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.12% fail on
Parking brake performance
(75% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Rbt
(74% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.093% fail on Parking brake performance (76% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.023% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.12% fail on
Rbt
(74% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.95% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
0.42% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.42% fail on Lever (110% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.37% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.19% fail on Pedal
- 0.19% fail on Hand lever
- 0.21% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.047% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.047% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.047% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(86% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.047% fail on Anti-lock braking system (80% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.047% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.023% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.023% fail on Servos
-
1.6% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(43% better than other 2012 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Visibility
- 3.1% fail on Wipers (34% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Washers (66% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.070% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.070% fail on Windscreen
-
0.75% fail on
Suspension
(92% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(81% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (61% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.093% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.070% fail on Ball joint
- 0.023% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.23% fail on
Suspension arms
(92% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes (87% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.047% fail on Ball joint (97% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.023% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.093% fail on Shock absorbers (82% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.070% fail on Wheel bearings (80% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.023% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.023% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.023% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.023% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.30% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(81% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.72% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(71% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Exhaust system (58% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Bumpers
-
0.093% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.093% fail on Tank (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.070% fail on
Seats
- 0.070% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.047% fail on
Body
- 0.047% fail on Other body component
-
0.047% fail on
Doors
-
0.023% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.023% fail on Hinge
-
0.023% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.023% fail on Door condition
-
0.023% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.023% fail on Undertray
-
0.49% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.49% fail on Registration plates
-
0.23% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.23% fail on Attachment
-
0.14% fail on
Steering
(91% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.070% fail on
Steering play
- 0.070% fail on Steering rack
-
0.023% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.023% fail on Steering rack
- 0.023% fail on Steering column
- 0.023% fail on Steering shaft
-
0.070% fail on
Steering play
-
0.14% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(93% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(93% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Spark ignition
(91% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (82% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.023% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.023% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.12% fail on
Spark ignition
(91% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(93% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(82% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.070% fail on
Seat belts
(74% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.047% fail on Condition (81% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.023% fail on Requirements
- 0.047% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (88% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.070% fail on
Seat belts
(74% better than other 2012 cars)
Read the Honest John Review
-
Lexus CT 200h (2011 - 2020)
Upmarket hatchback powered by the same hybrid system as the Toyota Prius. Exceptional front seat legroom. High-quality interior.