Lexus CT 200h MOT Results

Registered in 2012
84.9% pass rate
from 3,722 tests in 2017
(28% better than other 2012 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 cars and highlighted areas where the Lexus CT 200h is unusually good or bad.

  • 6.3% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (23% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamps (84% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp (89% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.054% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.054% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.027% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.027% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 2.5% fail on Registration plate lamp (34% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.081% fail on Position lamps (95% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Front lamps (93% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.081% fail on Direction indicators (90% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Flashing type (90% better than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.054% fail on Side repeaters (86% better than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.027% fail on Individual lamps
    • 0.054% fail on Stop lamp (95% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.054% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 4.1% fail on Tyres (27% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Condition
    • 1.4% fail on Tread depth (50% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.027% fail on Size/type
  • 3.8% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.2% fail on Wipers
    • 0.59% fail on Washers (55% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.027% fail on Mirrors
  • 2.9% fail on Brakes (24% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Hub components (43% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Brake pads (40% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Brake discs (77% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.027% fail on Brake linings
    • 1.1% fail on Parking brake (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.89% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.70% fail on Parking brake performance (130% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Rear wheels (73% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.027% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.027% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.027% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.054% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.027% fail on ABS
  • 0.62% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.62% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.48% fail on Suspension (87% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.30% fail on Condition
    • 0.081% fail on Anti-roll bars (78% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.054% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (81% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.027% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.027% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.027% fail on Condition
    • 0.027% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.027% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.027% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.027% fail on Rear
    • 0.027% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.027% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.027% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.027% fail on Constant velocity joints
  • 0.19% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.19% fail on Attachment
  • 0.16% fail on Steering
    • 0.11% fail on Steering control (9 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Steering coupling (36 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.081% fail on Universal joint (37 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.027% fail on Steering column
    • 0.054% fail on Steering system (84% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.054% fail on Track rod end (79% better than other 2012 cars)
  • 0.13% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.13% fail on Body condition
  • 0.054% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (85% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.027% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.027% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
    • 0.027% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.027% fail on Condition
  • 0.027% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.027% fail on Emissions not tested
Read the Honest John Review

  • Lexus CT 200h (2011 on)
    Upmarket hybrid hatchback powered by the same hybrid system as the Toyota Prius. Exceptional front seat legroom. High quality interior.

    Search Good Garages