MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Land Rover » Range Rover » 2017

Land Rover Range Rover MOT Results

Registered in 2017
87.1% pass rate
from 5,827 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Range Rover is unusually good or bad.

  • 4.3% fail on Tyres (26% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Condition (92% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Tread depth (65% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.051% fail on Size/type
  • 3.2% fail on Visibility
    • 2.8% fail on Wipers
    • 0.31% fail on Washers (68% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.086% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.086% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.017% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.017% fail on View to rear
      • 0.017% fail on Mirrors
  • 2.7% fail on Brakes (29% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads (32% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Brake pads (33% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.24% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.45% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.14% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.10% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.069% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.034% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.034% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (9 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Brake performance not tested (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.069% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.034% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.086% fail on Service brake performance (70% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.051% fail on Rbt (81% better than other 2017 cars)
          • 0.051% fail on Service brake performance (78% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.034% fail on Decelerometer (23 times worse than other 2017 cars)
          • 0.034% fail on Service brake performance (23 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.086% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.051% fail on Rbt
          • 0.051% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.034% fail on Decelerometer (51 times worse than other 2017 cars)
          • 0.034% fail on Parking brake performance (131 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Rigid brake pipes (21 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.086% fail on Flexible brake hoses (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.051% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.051% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.017% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.017% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.017% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.017% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.017% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 1.3% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (53% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.70% fail on Headlamp aim (46% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Headlamp aim (46% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.34% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.26% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.086% fail on Headlamp (80% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.051% fail on Stop lamp (84% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.051% fail on Direction indicators (79% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.051% fail on Flashing type (79% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.034% fail on Side repeaters (81% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.017% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.051% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (75% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.034% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.034% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.034% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.034% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.034% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.017% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.017% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 0.76% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.72% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.62% fail on Compression ignition (190% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.50% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.017% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.017% fail on Particulate filter
      • 0.10% fail on Spark ignition (67% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.086% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.017% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.034% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.034% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.74% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.086% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.051% fail on Condition
      • 0.017% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.017% fail on Pre-tensioners
  • 0.63% fail on Identification of the vehicle (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.63% fail on Registration plates (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
  • 0.57% fail on Suspension (36% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Suspension arms (110% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Pins and bushes (140% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.051% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.069% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.034% fail on Pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Linkage
      • 0.017% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 0.017% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.017% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.017% fail on Other components
  • 0.43% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.31% fail on Transmission (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Drive shafts (180% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.27% fail on Joints (190% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.034% fail on Prop shafts (5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.034% fail on Joints (7 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.034% fail on Body
      • 0.017% fail on Mounting fixings
      • 0.017% fail on Other body component
    • 0.034% fail on Doors
      • 0.017% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.017% fail on Door condition
      • 0.017% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.017% fail on Door condition
    • 0.017% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.017% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.017% fail on Seats
      • 0.017% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.017% fail on Cabs
      • 0.017% fail on Steps
  • 0.14% fail on Steering
    • 0.12% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.069% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.034% fail on Drag link end (17 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.017% fail on Power steering
      • 0.017% fail on Operation
  • 0.14% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.086% fail on Attachment
    • 0.051% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages