MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Land Rover » Range Rover » 2010

Land Rover Range Rover MOT Results

Registered in 2010
74.6% pass rate
from 3,801 tests in 2021
(29% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Range Rover is unusually good or bad.

  • 11% fail on Suspension (19% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 8.1% fail on Suspension arms (98% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Pins and bushes (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Ball joint (95% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.079% fail on Suspension arm
    • 1.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (52% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Linkage ball joints (46% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (50% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.026% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.58% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (45 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Operation (90 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Suspension unit (36 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Bellows (33 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.026% fail on Levelling valve
    • 0.55% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.34% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.053% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.21% fail on Wheel bearings (62% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.11% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.026% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.026% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.026% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.079% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.053% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.026% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.026% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 7.6% fail on Brakes
    • 4.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (30% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.53% fail on Brake discs and drums (53% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.53% fail on Brake discs (53% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Brake performance (58% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.92% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (49% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.42% fail on Rbt (sp) (75% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.39% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.079% fail on Gradient tester (sp) (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.026% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 0.39% fail on Brake performance not tested (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Service brake performance (84% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Rbt (85% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.29% fail on Service brake performance (83% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.026% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.026% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.18% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (67% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.079% fail on Rbt (sp) (86% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.053% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.026% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.079% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.026% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.026% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.13% fail on Parking brake performance (83% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Rbt (83% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.11% fail on Parking brake performance (84% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.026% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
    • 0.32% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.21% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.18% fail on Anti-lock braking system (61% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.29% fail on Electronic parking brake (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.11% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.026% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.11% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (69% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Pedal
    • 0.11% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.079% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.053% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.026% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.053% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.053% fail on Other components
  • 4.5% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (62% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim (47% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim (43% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (83% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (41% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamps (62% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Headlamp (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.026% fail on Matched pair
    • 0.32% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.13% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.079% fail on Trailer electrical socket (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.079% fail on Horn
      • 0.026% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.29% fail on Stop lamp (90% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Direction indicators (87% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Flashing type (87% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Individual direction indicators (83% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.053% fail on Side repeaters (93% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.16% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.026% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.079% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.026% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.026% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.026% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 4.4% fail on Tyres (27% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Tread depth (63% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Size/type
  • 3.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure (23% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Transmission (51% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Drive shafts (55% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Joints (57% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.026% fail on Prop shaft
        • 0.026% fail on Joints
    • 0.26% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.24% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.026% fail on Tank
    • 0.16% fail on Doors
      • 0.11% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.11% fail on Door condition
      • 0.026% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.026% fail on Door condition
      • 0.026% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.026% fail on Door condition
    • 0.13% fail on Exhaust system (92% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.079% fail on Body
      • 0.079% fail on Other body component
    • 0.079% fail on Seats
      • 0.079% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.026% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.026% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.026% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 0.026% fail on Bumpers
  • 2.6% fail on Visibility (51% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Washers (50% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Wipers (52% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.11% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.079% fail on View to rear
      • 0.079% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.026% fail on Bonnet
  • 1.4% fail on Steering (42% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Steering linkage components (47% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Track rod end (52% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.026% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.026% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.18% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.18% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.13% fail on Power steering
      • 0.079% fail on Operation
      • 0.053% fail on Other components
      • 0.026% fail on Rams
    • 0.026% fail on Steering play
      • 0.026% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (62% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Exhaust emissions (66% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.55% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.26% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (58% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.079% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.26% fail on Spark ignition (87% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (84% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Catalyst emissions (89% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.18% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.026% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.026% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.026% fail on Other leaks
  • 0.84% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.58% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.24% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.18% fail on Condition
      • 0.053% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.026% fail on Airbags
      • 0.026% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 0.82% fail on Identification of the vehicle (94% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.82% fail on Registration plates (95% worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.42% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.24% fail on Attachment
    • 0.18% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages