Land Rover Range Rover MOT Results

Registered in 2010
77.5% pass rate
from 3,355 tests in 2017
(23% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Range Rover is unusually good or bad.

  • 7.7% fail on Suspension
    • 3.4% fail on Suspension arms (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Drive shafts (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Front drive shafts (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Constant velocity joints (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.060% fail on Drive shafts
    • 1.0% fail on Anti-roll bars (36% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (38% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.060% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.030% fail on Condition
    • 0.98% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.98% fail on Condition
    • 0.89% fail on Front suspension joints (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.15% fail on Front
    • 0.089% fail on Air suspension (20 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.089% fail on Operation (77 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Suspension unit
    • 0.089% fail on Bonded suspension (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.089% fail on Condition (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.060% fail on Fluid suspension (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Suspension unit
      • 0.030% fail on Other components
    • 0.060% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.060% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.060% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.060% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.060% fail on Torque/reaction arms (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.030% fail on Panhard rods
      • 0.030% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 6.0% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (55% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim (56% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.86% fail on Headlamps (62% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Headlamp (75% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.060% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.030% fail on Matched pair
    • 0.18% fail on Position lamps (94% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Front lamps (94% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Rear lamps
    • 0.15% fail on Direction indicators (90% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Flashing type (90% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.089% fail on Individual lamps (89% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.060% fail on Side repeaters (89% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Stop lamp (95% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.030% fail on Battery
    • 0.030% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.030% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.030% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.030% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.030% fail on Horn
    • 0.030% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 5.8% fail on Brakes
    • 2.7% fail on Hydraulic systems (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Components (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Pipes (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Hoses
      • 0.24% fail on Leaks (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Hub components
      • 2.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.45% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.060% fail on Brake back plates (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Brake performance (44% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.12% fail on Rear wheels (89% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.089% fail on Brake operation (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.089% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.030% fail on Gradient hand brake
      • 0.030% fail on Front wheels
    • 0.089% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.060% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.060% fail on Parking brake (83% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 0.030% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.030% fail on Pedal
        • 0.030% fail on Condition
    • 0.030% fail on ABS
  • 5.0% fail on Tyres (26% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Tread depth (64% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.089% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
    • 0.089% fail on Size/type
  • 3.2% fail on Driver's view of the road (33% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Wipers
    • 1.0% fail on Washers (42% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.060% fail on Mirrors
  • 0.89% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (37% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Fuel system (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Cap
      • 0.18% fail on System (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Emissions
    • 0.15% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.089% fail on Exhaust system (90% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.89% fail on Registration plates and VIN (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.89% fail on Registration plate (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.48% fail on Steering (53% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Steering system (68% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Track rod end (74% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.089% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.030% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.030% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.18% fail on Power steering (200% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Operation
      • 0.060% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.060% fail on Other components
  • 0.48% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.33% fail on Attachment
    • 0.15% fail on Condition
  • 0.48% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.30% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.27% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.030% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.18% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.18% fail on Condition
  • 0.24% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.12% fail on Body condition
    • 0.060% fail on Doors
      • 0.030% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.030% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.060% fail on Seats
      • 0.030% fail on Passengers
      • 0.030% fail on Drivers

Search Good Garages