Land Rover Range Rover MOT Results

Registered in 2010
75.6% pass rate
from 3,930 tests in 2020
(28% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Range Rover is unusually good or bad.

  • 9.4% fail on Suspension (13% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.0% fail on Suspension arms (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Ball joint (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Pins and bushes (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (59% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (52% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Linkage ball joints (69% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint dust cover (67% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Linkage
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.076% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.94% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.46% fail on Other suspension component (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.051% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.051% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.36% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (29 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Operation (59 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Suspension unit (20 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.076% fail on Levelling valve (81 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Bellows
      • 0.025% fail on Other components
    • 0.13% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.10% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.025% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.10% fail on Wheel bearings (77% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.051% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.025% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.025% fail on Ball joint
  • 7.3% fail on Brakes
    • 3.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.5% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.051% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.71% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.69% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.025% fail on Brake drums
    • 1.1% fail on Brake performance (66% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (60% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.48% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.051% fail on Rbt (sp) (96% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Service brake performance (79% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.31% fail on Rbt (81% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.28% fail on Service brake performance (80% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.025% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.051% fail on Decelerometer (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.051% fail on Service brake performance (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.051% fail on Parking brake performance (92% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.025% fail on Rbt
          • 0.025% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.025% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.025% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.025% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.025% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
    • 0.25% fail on Flexible brake hoses (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.18% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.051% fail on Anti-lock braking system (83% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.10% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 0.10% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.076% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.025% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.051% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (83% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.051% fail on Pedal
    • 0.025% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.025% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 4.6% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (65% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim (49% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim (49% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamps (48% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.89% fail on Headlamp (67% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (40% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.10% fail on Horn
      • 0.076% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.025% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.025% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.18% fail on Stop lamp (94% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Direction indicators (92% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Flashing type (92% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.076% fail on Individual direction indicators (93% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.076% fail on Side repeaters (88% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.076% fail on Position lamps (96% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.076% fail on Position lamp (96% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.051% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (89% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.051% fail on Rear fog lamp (89% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.051% fail on Rear fog lamp (89% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.051% fail on Reversing lamps (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.051% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.025% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 4.1% fail on Tyres (36% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Tread depth (68% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Size/type
  • 2.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 1.9% fail on Transmission (63% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Drive shafts (59% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Joints (61% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.13% fail on Joints
      • 0.025% fail on Belts
    • 0.25% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.23% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.025% fail on System
    • 0.13% fail on Body
      • 0.13% fail on Other body component
    • 0.10% fail on Exhaust system (93% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Doors
      • 0.076% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.076% fail on Door condition
      • 0.025% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.025% fail on Door condition
    • 0.025% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.025% fail on Undertray
  • 2.1% fail on Visibility (58% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Wipers (46% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.56% fail on Washers (76% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on View to rear
      • 0.15% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.10% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.10% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.051% fail on Driver's view
  • 1.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (51% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Exhaust emissions (61% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Compression ignition (39% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.48% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.25% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (63% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.025% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.025% fail on Catalytic converter
      • 0.31% fail on Spark ignition (80% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (64% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.025% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.36% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.25% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.076% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.025% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 0.97% fail on Steering (47% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.81% fail on Steering linkage components (47% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Track rod end (44% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.13% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.13% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.025% fail on Power steering
      • 0.025% fail on Operation
  • 0.61% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.61% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.59% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.33% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.23% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.23% fail on Condition
    • 0.025% fail on Airbags
      • 0.025% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.41% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.28% fail on Attachment
    • 0.13% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages