Land Rover Range Rover MOT Results

Registered in 2009
73.4% pass rate
from 3,220 tests in 2020
(28% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Range Rover is unusually good or bad.

  • 9.8% fail on Brakes (23% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.6% fail on Brake linings and pads (49% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.6% fail on Brake pads (49% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.031% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.50% fail on Brake discs and drums (54% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.50% fail on Brake discs (54% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Brake performance (35% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.93% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Gradient tester (sp) (33 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.093% fail on Rbt (sp) (94% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.031% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 0.68% fail on Brake performance not tested (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Service brake performance (72% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.50% fail on Rbt (76% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.50% fail on Service brake performance (71% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.093% fail on Decelerometer (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.093% fail on Service brake performance (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (86% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.031% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.031% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.031% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.031% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.031% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.031% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 0.53% fail on Flexible brake hoses (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.25% fail on Electronic parking brake (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.16% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.093% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.19% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.19% fail on Pedal
    • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.062% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.062% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.12% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.093% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.031% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.031% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.031% fail on Other components
  • 8.9% fail on Suspension (30% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.9% fail on Suspension arms (73% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Ball joint (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Pins and bushes (43% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.031% fail on Suspension arm
    • 1.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (59% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (51% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Linkage ball joints (62% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage
      • 0.093% fail on Ball joint (74% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.53% fail on Shock absorbers (64% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.34% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (20 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Operation (31 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.093% fail on Suspension unit (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Levelling valve (42 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Pipes
      • 0.031% fail on Other components
    • 0.16% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.12% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.031% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.12% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.093% fail on Pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.031% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.12% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.12% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.031% fail on Axles
      • 0.031% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
  • 4.6% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (67% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim (61% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim (58% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (49% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.84% fail on Headlamps (74% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Headlamp (80% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Position lamps (70% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Position lamp (69% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.56% fail on Stop lamp (85% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Direction indicators (83% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Flashing type (83% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Individual direction indicators (80% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.093% fail on Side repeaters (85% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.093% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.093% fail on Electrical equipment (78% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.031% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.031% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.062% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (89% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Rear fog lamp (89% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.062% fail on Rear fog lamp (89% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 4.4% fail on Tyres (33% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Tread depth (70% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.062% fail on Size/type
  • 3.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 2.7% fail on Transmission (70% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Drive shafts (68% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Joints (68% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.031% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.16% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.12% fail on Joints
        • 0.031% fail on Prop shaft
    • 0.34% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.19% fail on System (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.031% fail on Hose
    • 0.12% fail on Body
      • 0.12% fail on Other body component
    • 0.12% fail on Doors
      • 0.093% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.093% fail on Door condition
      • 0.031% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.031% fail on Door condition
    • 0.031% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.031% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.031% fail on Seats
      • 0.031% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.031% fail on Undertray
  • 2.5% fail on Visibility (53% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Washers (51% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.96% fail on Wipers (63% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on View to rear
      • 0.19% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.062% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.062% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.062% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.031% fail on Bonnet
  • 1.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (58% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Exhaust emissions (58% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.62% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.50% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.062% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.031% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.031% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.031% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
      • 0.31% fail on Spark ignition (85% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (72% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.062% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.031% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.12% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.062% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.031% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.031% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 1.1% fail on Steering (40% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.90% fail on Steering linkage components (42% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.81% fail on Track rod end (44% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.031% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.031% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.19% fail on Power steering
      • 0.062% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.062% fail on Other components
      • 0.031% fail on Operation
      • 0.031% fail on Pump
    • 0.031% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.031% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.031% fail on Steering play
      • 0.031% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.71% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.53% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.19% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.19% fail on Condition
  • 0.47% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.37% fail on Attachment
    • 0.093% fail on Condition
  • 0.40% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.40% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages