MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Land Rover » Range Rover » 2009

Land Rover Range Rover MOT Results

Registered in 2009
73.2% pass rate
from 3,063 tests in 2021
(30% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Range Rover is unusually good or bad.

  • 9.6% fail on Brakes
    • 4.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.0% fail on Brake linings and pads (48% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.0% fail on Brake pads (49% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Brake discs and drums (60% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.46% fail on Brake discs (60% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Brake performance (46% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (33% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.72% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.59% fail on Rbt (sp) (70% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.033% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
        • 0.033% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 0.69% fail on Brake performance not tested (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Service brake performance (77% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.49% fail on Rbt (80% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.49% fail on Service brake performance (77% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.065% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.065% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.16% fail on Parking brake performance (82% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Rbt (85% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.098% fail on Parking brake performance (87% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.033% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.033% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.033% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.13% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (78% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.065% fail on Rbt (sp) (89% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.065% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.033% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.065% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.52% fail on Electronic parking brake (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.16% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (75% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Anti-lock braking system (82% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.13% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.13% fail on Pedal
    • 0.098% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.098% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.033% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.033% fail on Servos
  • 9.4% fail on Suspension (36% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Suspension arms (46% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Ball joint (82% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Pins and bushes (53% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (64% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (56% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Linkage ball joints (60% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint dust cover (59% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.065% fail on Ball joint (84% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.033% fail on Linkage
    • 0.52% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.33% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.065% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.39% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (21 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Suspension unit (26 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Operation (21 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Bellows
      • 0.033% fail on Levelling valve
      • 0.033% fail on Other components
    • 0.36% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.29% fail on Shock absorbers (67% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Suspension rods (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Suspension rod
      • 0.033% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.16% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.065% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.065% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.033% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.033% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 4.8% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (62% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim (49% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim (46% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamps (65% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Headlamp (69% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.85% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (57% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.59% fail on Stop lamp (83% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.16% fail on Electrical wiring (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Horn
      • 0.033% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.26% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (61% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Rear fog lamp (61% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Rear fog lamp (60% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Direction indicators (92% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Flashing type (92% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.098% fail on Individual direction indicators (92% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.033% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.033% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.16% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.098% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.098% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.065% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.033% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.033% fail on Reversing lamp switch
  • 4.6% fail on Tyres (25% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Tread depth (63% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Size/type
  • 3.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.3% fail on Transmission (71% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Drive shafts (59% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on Joints (59% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.033% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.36% fail on Prop shafts (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Prop shaft (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Joints
        • 0.033% fail on Flexible couplings
        • 0.033% fail on Bearing housing
    • 0.29% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.20% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.065% fail on System (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Tank
    • 0.20% fail on Exhaust system (90% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Doors
      • 0.098% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.098% fail on Door condition
      • 0.033% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.033% fail on Door condition
    • 0.098% fail on Body
      • 0.098% fail on Other body component
    • 0.065% fail on Seats
      • 0.033% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.033% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.065% fail on Cabs (16 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.065% fail on Steps (97 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.033% fail on Towbar
      • 0.033% fail on Other towbar components
  • 2.4% fail on Visibility (59% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Wipers (49% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.95% fail on Washers (69% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.098% fail on View to rear
      • 0.098% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.033% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.033% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.033% fail on Windscreen
  • 1.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (56% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Exhaust emissions (60% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.78% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.42% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.033% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.033% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.39% fail on Spark ignition (86% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (73% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.065% fail on Catalyst emissions (95% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.033% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.26% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.098% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.098% fail on Transmission oil leaks (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.065% fail on Other leaks
  • 1.4% fail on Steering (41% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Steering linkage components (45% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Track rod end (50% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.26% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.26% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.098% fail on Power steering
      • 0.033% fail on Operation
      • 0.033% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.033% fail on Other components
  • 0.65% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.65% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.59% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.42% fail on Attachment
    • 0.16% fail on Condition
  • 0.49% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (54% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.20% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.13% fail on Condition
      • 0.033% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.033% fail on Attachment
    • 0.033% fail on Airbags
      • 0.033% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.033% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.033% fail on Steps and stairs
      • 0.033% fail on Steps

Search Good Garages